Talk:Sapient Species

From BIONICLEsector01

Should the Glatorian be moved to Unnamed Species? Master Inika (Talk) 23:50, 5 June 2014 (CEST)

Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooo. No, no, no, no. ... While they are technically an unnamed species, there is too much information on the Glatorian page to fit on here. (The idea that "Glatorian" isn't the species name is stupid and overcomplicated anyway, but that's outside my purview to change.) Note, also, that we have a page for the City-Building Creatures, even though they have no name at all. Really, this page would be better entitled "Unknown Species", those on which we have very little information. --Angel Bob (talk) 00:22, 6 June 2014 (CEST)
Oh, I misspoke; I meant moving this page's information about Glatorian to the Sapient Species/Unnamed Species page. Unrelated to the Glatorians' own page. Master Inika (Talk) 07:13, 6 June 2014 (CEST)
Oh. Well, that makes more sense, but I still disagree. The Glatorian are one of the major species on Spherus Magna, so it wouldn't do to not have them mentioned on this page. Indeed, I think we should have an entry for the Unnamed Species page as well, since it doesn't make a lot of sense to not mention them on the species page. --Angel Bob (talk) 15:32, 6 June 2014 (CEST)

Should we remove the Element Lords?

They're not really a different species, just mutants, so shouldn't they be removed? ~ OnionShark

The ELs and the GBs should be listed on the page, and I added them under the Glatorian section. -- Surel-Nuva (Talk) 19:47, 2 November 2016 (CET)

Page Perhaps Lacks Species

Should Vorox, Zesk, Krana and Protocairn be added? I believe they fit under definition of Sapient Species.

Protocairns should definitely be incorporated somewhere on this page; it's only tricky because they are a mutant form of Matoran, so really, they should be a subspecies of Matoran. It's the same with Vorox and Zesk - those are subspecies of Glatorian and Agori, so they should not have their own entries. Krana are a little more iffy - I hesitate to call them a sapient species but I don't know exactly why.
Also, remember to leave your signature after your comments. You can do that by typing --~~~~ and the site will do it for you. --Angel Bob (talk) 17:35, 11 April 2017 (CET)
Right sorry, I seem to have habit of not adding signature when making a new section, but when replies I do so. Anyways I can call Krana as species, they have narrow sapience but thats seem due to (I do not suggest without confirmation of Greg to add) Velika not bothering changing their "AI". However Krana-Kal for instance show more intelligence than average Krana.--BionicleMax (talk) 00:18, 12 April 2017 (CET)