Template talk:ToaToolsNav

Toa Cordak

Should we add a row for the Toa Cordak? I know it's only two, Lesovikk and Nikila, but that's hardly less than the Mangai. Dag (talk) 21:57, 24 February 2025 (UTC)

Well, we don't have a name or page for the trident, do we? ~ Wolk (talk) 05:44, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

Imo we don't have a page for it, only because we don't have an example use of it. But we have just as much info about it as Mutran's Shadow Spear. And it may just have been called Trident, it's not unusual to have it just like that.--SurelNuva (Talk) 06:04, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

The trident doesn't need a page to be individually linked on the nav, just like the Hagah Spears. This would mainly be to ease the transition for when the arsenal pages proposal passes. Either way, I don't think it or Lesovikk's tool fit the "Other Toa" category since we know a considerable amount about their team. Dag (talk) 17:02, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

It's still an unnamed tool. With Template:EnemyToolsNav, we likewise only link to things that have names & pages... ~ Wolk (talk) 17:14, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

That seems arbitrary. It also depends on what you mean by it being unnamed. As Surel has already pointed out, many tools are already called simple things like "claw", "axe", or "sword". If you're looking for a canon source, Dreams of Destruction Ch 9 calls it "trident", so I think that should be as good as any of these other examples. And about it not having it's own page, I say again that it doesn't seem any more extreme than linking the individual Hagah Spears even though they all go to the same shared page. Dag (talk) 17:29, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

Fair enough, I thought it came from the artwork, though in that case I think there are are more things that should be present in the tools navs generally (for instance, the Shadow Blade). ~ Wolk (talk) 20:57, 25 February 2025 (UTC)