Talk:Vultraz

say, I don't know if anyone is still out there to here this, but should we realy keep his staus a alive? I mean we don't know for sure he is right?

Until we get an indication as to otherwise, he'll remain as "alive". I doubt the GB's would actually want to kill him. -- I AM THE DOREK _{do not truffle with me} 17:01, 28 January 2012 (PST)

Maybe we should change his status to "Unknown" becaus we dont WHAT they wanted to do with him, and odds are we will NEVER know.

The GB's, while of questionable morality, still most likely would not kill him. Just because we aren't going to get an update there doesn't mean we get to guess. His last known status, Alive, is what we will have to stick with. ζω·τωμανα•

The PDF instructions at the bottom of the page are for the wrong set. —Planetperson 00:33, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Fixed. Thanks! -- Morris the Mata Nui Cow (talk) 01:48, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Mutated by Whom?

This source indicates that Mutran was responsible for Vultraz's changes, not Gorast. This contradicts Chapter 2 of BIA, in which Gorast takes credit for his alterations. - Toa Jala ^Converse 20:22, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Since BIA is an in-story source and it was technically Dorek (and not Greg) who suggested that Mutran was responsible, I'd say Gorast takes precedence here. Otherwise, one can claim plausible deniability and say that Gorast made Vultraz unrecognizable while Mutran made him taller? --PeabodySam (talk) 23:12, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

I'd say go with the story. ~ Wolk (talk) 11:30, 7 May 2024 (UTC)