Talk:Vezon
Would it make sense that Vezon's element was Anarchy? (The preceding unsigned comment was made by Toa Inika)
- Anarchy isn't known to be an element. So not really. •Shine 06:35, 15 December 2014 (CET)
Pronunciation
I believe the pronunciation given right now (Vay-ZONN) is incorrect. The 2006 Titans Commercial pronounces it VEE-zonn.
- The commercials tend to be inaccurate from time to time. We generally go with what Greg says the pronunciation is (even if that is horribly confusing sometimes). In this case, it's pretty cut and dry. -- I AM THE DOREK do not truffle with me 22:54, 22 May 2014 (CEST)
Canister
When did teridax get a toa canister from an order of mata nui agent? Intelligence4 (talk) 05:10, 29 June 2015 (CEST)
- Apparently an agent went to Mata Nui in a Toa Canister at some point (maybe to write its entry in BIONICLE: World?) but Teridax killed him/her and took the canister. That must have happened when the Metru Nui folks were hanging out up there, so somewhere between 1 and 1,001 years ago. Then Vezon could use the agent's canister to leave for Voya Nui. -- Morris the Mata Nui Cow (talk) 06:21, 29 June 2015 (CEST)
- what was our source for that info? Intelligence4 (talk) 20:04, 3 July 2015 (CEST)
- Dunno. We know an OoMN agent must have been up to Mata Nui at some point since it has an entry in BIONICLE: World, but the details sound like Greg quote material. If you're on BZPower, you can ask fishers64 about it since she has copies of old Greg quotes. -- Morris the Mata Nui Cow (talk) 21:13, 3 July 2015 (CEST)
- what was our source for that info? Intelligence4 (talk) 20:04, 3 July 2015 (CEST)
Pedantics
Just for the record, "rockfall" is in fact a legitimate word. ;P --Angel Bob (talk) 23:10, 6 March 2017 (CET)
S's
Based on my understanding, at the end of the day s's or s' are both acceptable, just use whichever sounds better. :P So let's keep it as Kardas's since that's what the current revision says. -- Morris the Mata Nui Cow (talk) 03:02, 16 July 2017 (CET)
Vezon
It's only new to me that there's a Vezon page on Facebook? :D — Surel—Nuva (Talk) 21:53, 1 August 2017 (CET)
Found a citation
"Vezon escaped the Zyglak with the help of Brutaka."
Right now, this statement says "citation needed", but I found it:
https://greg.thegreatarchives.com/2003-2008/page305#post12193-line4,15
The Jerminator (talk) 07:13, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Mild pedantry on a singular factoid
So, something that's mildly bugging me about Vezon's trivia section is the particular phrasing of the factoid about Vezon's voice. Currently, it's phrased as "Vezon has a little high-pitched, soft voice." The citation for it arranges the descriptors the other way around, saying that Greg thinks of it as "soft, a little high-pitched". This is ever so slightly ambiguous to me, as while it's not necessarily wrong, it is easy to interpret as three facts about his voice (little, high-pitched, and soft) instead of two (soft and somewhat high-pitched) that paint different pictures from one another. The question is, if this is in need of rectifying at all, what's the best way to do it? Swapping them around verbatim ("Vezon has a soft, a little high pitched voice") is just plain wrong, but my preferred solution of adding Greg into the mix ("Greg Farshtey described Vezon's voice as 'soft, a little high-pitched'" or "as 'soft' and 'a little high-pitched'") may rub up against wiki precedent of equating Greg's expression of what he's "...always thought of..." as verbatim canon until contradicted that I'm unaware of as a newbie to this particular site.
Of course, this doesn't particularly matter, and is by far not the most annoying thing about Vezon (I recently found out that we definitely know what his head doesn't look like, but there's room to speculate on what it might ), but it is a good chance for me to get a feel on how to word things more gooder relative to the standards of this site.
VootCaboot (talk) 4:19, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
- I've corrected the wording by copying the exact one from the quote, I hope it helps. For the head, I'm not entire sure what's your point, if you read the whole qoute, Greg says that Vezon's head looks like the one from the set, minus the Ignika, and the Olmak has no visible parts on it, he also firmly said that Vezon doesn't look different, nor did his colors change, and Greg originally said that Vezon's body absorbed the Olmak. I hope these clarifies how he still looks like. Also this quote suggests that Vezon only absorbed the powers of the mask, and the powerless mask got abandoned, but this contrwdicts the pervious quotes which say Vezon absorbed the mask itself.--Surel (Talk) 06:27, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
(If I'm being completely honest these types of factoids are so weird and irrelevant to me that I wonder why we include them at all, BUT I got Morris to add a Meta tag so whatever I'll fix it later) -- Dorek Talk 18:12, 2 June 2022 (UTC)
- Not gonna lie, it wouldn't change anything, it doesn't matter if the things in the trivia are on the main page, or under the meta tag/page which should be directly linked from the page too. It will be on the wiki, it's 10 times clearer if it's on the main page, to avoid confusion, but whatever.--Surel (Talk) 09:34, 3 June 2022 (UTC)