Talk:City-Building Creatures

Their design is clearly based on the Archives Mole. Should that be mentioned somewhere on the page? Toa Magnemite 17:33, 16 January 2013 (PST)

No, we generally don't do things like this if you're referring to it from a sight perspective. Just like Sand Bat doesn't look like a Shelek. From a universe perspective, saying these were based off the Mole or vise-versa is speculative. Lord Nektann

I think this is different and should be mentioned. The Sand Bat uses the Shelek in its design, but it isn't Shelek in its whole. The City-Building Creatures are however, straight-up using the Archives Mole model, much like how the Scarabax Beetle giant was based on the Malum model. It is not an in-universe thing, no, but that is why it'd be in the Trivia. ~ Wolk (talk) 11:30, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

As long as it's phrased properly and isn't a huge leap in logic, I'm okay with it. -- Dorek _Talk 04:42, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Yes, but here comes the other fact, that the Kestora were clearly designed after Turaga Dume's set form, even up to the dual-colored Kiril, and we should probably mention that one too.--Surel-Nuva (Talk) 10:15, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Never responded to this... huh. I think the difference is that the Kestora aren't as obvious or certain. If we are certain of what they're modelled after, then sure,we can add that too. ~ Wolk (talk) 14:45, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

I've recently made an analysis on thr Kestora talk page, as I rechecked the book. They are basically Dekar with Dume's colors.--Surel (Talk) 14:53, 1 May 2021 (UTC)