From BIONICLEsector01

I was wondering whether this should be put under the creatures category on the main page. Firespitter Lhii (talk) 16:55, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

We define "creature" as an organic animal that originates from Spherus Magna. In this case, the Vatuka is neither a creature nor a Rahi; it is, however, an elemental being, which is what we have a category for. -- Dorek Talk External Image 21:05, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

Living Wall Vatuka

I wasn't sure to say the Living Wall is a Vatuka, that's why I tried to leave it ambiguous. The Greg quote says type of, so I thought they are similar, but the Living Wall is still different.--Surel (Talk) 19:46, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

Maybe... When I reread the quote it sounded unambigious, but the wording of the question is so mangled that it's hard to say what Greg thought he was answering/what the question was actually trying to ask. What I read the quote as saying is that they are indeed one and the same. The Encyclopedia (entry written back in 2005, and not edited in the updated edition) says "It is now believed the Vatuka may have been a creation of the Energized Protodermis Entity, who once sent a similar stone creature against the Toa Metru. I also noticed the Adventures 6 uses the term "rock monster", which as we have in the trivia section, is a name for the Vatuka. Also did Dorek travel in time? ~ Wolk (talk) 20:19, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
Yeah, the wording of the question throws me off too, first I read it like they are the same, but then reading the actual articles then rereading the question makes it weird a bit. And either Dorek did travel back in time, or Lhii updated their signature. it's sus.--Surel (Talk) 21:01, 10 June 2023 (UTC)