From BIONICLEsector01

I would suggest this page to be fused with Dekar. Now we might consider Dekar-Hydraxon as a "new form" of Dekar, rather than Hydraxon's reincarnation, since the original is still alive. Having three pages (Dekar, Hydraxon & Dekar-Hydraxon) seems unnecessary to me. What do you think?

--Diebeq5b 21:57, 30 November 2012 (PST)

He goes by Hydraxon and is more that a straight transformed version, all things considered. We discussed the other options, and this solution was the most liked. In theory we could do it to the Maxilos page too; it just helps cut down on clutter. -- I AM THE DOREK do not truffle with me 17:40, 1 December 2012 (PST)
I do not know how that should be considered. For me, it's like the Ignika had hypnotized Dekar to live a life that is not his (And, after all, it's not like Dekar is dead, but is dormant in that Hydraxon's mind. Because of that point about the repressed Matoran memories I don't consider Dekar-Hydraxon to be a third character, but a warped version of the Matoran he used to be). Also, having everything in a single article would be more neat in my opinion... --Diebeq5b 15:43, 2 December 2012 (PST)
He's less than a fusion but ostensibly more than just a transformed character; his circumstances make him fairly unique in that regard. He is made different by being more than the sum of his parts. Not the original Hydraxon, but not quite Dekar either because Hydraxon was layered on as opposed to being just used to enhance Dekar. I much prefer this organization. -- I AM THE DOREK do not truffle with me 16:22, 2 December 2012 (PST)


I don't believe this has been brought up before; sorry if it has. Anyway, since Dekar-Hydraxon has never been referred to as such in the story and that isn't his official name, do you think the page should have the nickname notice? -- Morris the Mata Nui Cow (talk) 22:21, 17 January 2013 (PST)


Egh, Dekar-Hydraxon sounds odd to me. Is there any other way we can call this guy? It bothers me a little bit. --- Creep 17:22, 2 March 2017 (CET)

New Hydraxon? I don't know... -- SurelNuva (Talk) 17:24, 2 March 2017 (CET)
I had Fake Hydraxon in mind, but does it really count as a fake? Or a copy. I don't know, I'm not a big fan of the Dekar-Hydraxon stuff. --- Creep 17:26, 2 March 2017 (CET)
I'm okay with whatever, as long as it isn't Hydraxon's Replacement. :P In all seriousness, how about Hydraxon (Duplicate)? If we're determined not to merge this page with Dekar, that is... --Angel Bob (talk) 23:11, 2 March 2017 (CET)
That one I love. Looks simple and isn't a mouthful like Dekar-Hydraxon. --- Creep 00:09, 3 March 2017 (CET)