BIONICLEsector01 talk:Articles for Deletion: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 18:44, 26 April 2017

4/6 Toa Hagah Spears

Look at the pages - there is nothing listed on these pages that is not already listed on the relevant Toa's pages. The Seismic Spear has the most information out of all of them, but it still barely says anything about the weapon. As much as I would like to have more information about them, these pages are redundant and don't contribute anything to the wiki. --Angel Bob (talk) 22:54, 12 April 2017 (CET)

Delete 4/6 of the spears

--Angel Bob (talk) 22:54, 12 April 2017 (CET)

Keep the spears

Comments

I'm inclined to agree with you, but i think if we delete four of the pages, the other two should go as well - we could just move all the content we have on them to their relevant toa pages, under the masks and tools section or whatever. i just think it'd be weird to delete four of them and leave two there. Intelligence4 (talk) 17:43, 17 April 2017 (CET)

Or we could make a page for the Hagah weapons like we did for the Rahaga staffs. ~OnionShark 21:53, 17 April 2017 (CET)

I don't agree at all. Lava Spear and Cyclone Spear have images, Set Information, and Example Usages - more than enough to qualify for a page. The other four spears have none of this. We shouldn't be making decisions like this based on an all-or-nothing school of thought. If you think it would be too "weird" to have only two weapons for the Toa Hagah in Template:ToolsNav, we could easily keep the names in the navbox, and just set them up to link to their respective Toa pages' Mask and Tools sections.

I would also oppose making a page for all 6 weapons (for one, what would we even call the page?). Rahaga Staffs works because each of the weapons has an individual power, but not enough specific information to qualify for a page. The Avalanche Spear, etc. have nothing but their names. There just isn't enough info to justify listing these 4 anywhere but their respective Toa pages. --Angel Bob (talk) 22:51, 17 April 2017 (CET)

I think the information we have on the two spears is short enough that we could put it on the toa pages - set information, for one thing, isn't really independent, since they only came as part of the toa sets. Intelligence4 (talk) 19:43, 26 April 2017 (CET)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 {{Shortcut|AFD}}
-== Template:SkullRaiderNav ==
+== 4/6 Toa Hagah Spears ==
-{{Template:SkullRaiderNav}}
-I probably should have nominated this before merging it, but as you can see in Template:SkullCreaturesNav, the Skull Raiders and Skull Army can easily fit into the same navbox. I don't think we need separate templates. --[[User:Angel Bob|Angel Bob]] ([[User talk:Angel Bob|talk]]) 20:02, 14 August 2016 (CET)
-===Delete===
+[[Seismic Spear|Look]] [[Sub-Zero Spear|at]] [[Tidal Spear|the]] [[Avalanche Spear|pages]] - there is nothing listed on these pages that is not already listed on the relevant Toa's pages. The Seismic Spear has the most information out of all of them, but it still barely says anything about the weapon. As much as I would like to have more information about them, these pages are redundant and don't contribute anything to the wiki. --[[User:Angel Bob|Angel Bob]] ([[User talk:Angel Bob|talk]]) 22:54, 12 April 2017 (CET)
-#--[[User:Angel Bob|Angel Bob]] ([[User talk:Angel Bob|talk]]) 20:02, 14 August 2016 (CET)
-#--[[User:777stairs|777stairs]] ([[User talk:777stairs|talk]]) 20:14, 14 August 2016 (CET)
+===Delete 4/6 of the spears===
-#Because the templates have already been merged, we need to delete the Template:SkullRaiderNav. --'''[[User:Surel-nuva|<font color="DARKBLUE">Surel</font>-<font color="GOLDENROD">Nuva</font>]] <small>([[User talk:Surel-nuva|<font color="#8A7F8D">Talk</font>]])</small>''' 20:43, 14 August 2016 (CET)
+#--[[User:Angel Bob|Angel Bob]] ([[User talk:Angel Bob|talk]]) 22:54, 12 April 2017 (CET)
-#<font color="PaleTurquoise" Style="background:Black">[[User:Master Inika|<font color="PaleTurquoise">Master Inika]]</font><small><sup>   ([[User talk:Master Inika|<font color="PaleTurquoise">Talk</font>]]) </sup></small></font> 04:42, 5 October 2016 (CET)
+===Keep the spears===
 ===Comments===
+I'm inclined to agree with you, but i think if we delete four of the pages, the other two should go as well - we could just move all the content we have on them to their relevant toa pages, under the masks and tools section or whatever. i just think it'd be weird to delete four of them and leave two there. [[User:Intelligence4|Intelligence4]] ([[User talk:Intelligence4|talk]]) 17:43, 17 April 2017 (CET)
+:Or we could make a page for the Hagah weapons like we did for the Rahaga staffs. '''[[User:OnionShark|<font color="black">~</font><font color="castletongreen">OnionShark</font>]]''' 21:53, 17 April 2017 (CET)
+::I don't agree at all. [[Lava Spear]] and [[Cyclone Spear]] have images, Set Information, and Example Usages - more than enough to qualify for a page. The other four spears have none of this. We shouldn't be making decisions like this based on an all-or-nothing school of thought. If you think it would be too "weird" to have only two weapons for the Toa Hagah in Template:ToolsNav, we could easily keep the names in the navbox, and just set them up to link to their respective Toa pages' Mask and Tools sections.
+::I would also oppose making a page for all 6 weapons (for one, what would we even call the page?). [[Rahaga Staffs]] works because each of the weapons has an individual power, but not enough specific information to qualify for a page. The Avalanche Spear, etc. have nothing but their names. There just isn't enough info to justify listing these 4 anywhere but their respective Toa pages. --[[User:Angel Bob|Angel Bob]] ([[User talk:Angel Bob|talk]]) 22:51, 17 April 2017 (CET)
+:::I think the information we have on the two spears is short enough that we could put it on the toa pages - set information, for one thing, isn't really independent, since they only came as part of the toa sets. [[User:Intelligence4|Intelligence4]] ([[User talk:Intelligence4|talk]]) 19:43, 26 April 2017 (CET)