Talk:Field of Shadows

From BIONICLEsector01

Rahkshi?

Simply out of curiosity, how do we know that there is a Rahkshi of Limited Invulnerability in the Field of Shadows? Was it mentioned in Adventures 8? LockmanCapulet 20:02, 6 March 2013 (PST)


I came here to ask a question, but found that someone else already had: when was it revealed that there's a rahkshi of limited invulnerability in the field of shadows? Intelligence4 (talk) 06:04, 31 January 2017 (CET)

In the BA8 a Rahkshi annoying a Kahgarak which send the Rahkshi into the Field of Shadows. Whenua and Bomanga witnessed it. -- SurelNuva (Talk) 11:41, 31 January 2017 (CET)

but how do we know its power? Intelligence4 (talk) 08:55, 3 February 2017 (CET)
I don't have the book with me, but IIRC, the book described its color. Master Inika (Talk) 16:40, 3 February 2017 (CET)
i can check up on that in a few days, i think. Intelligence4 (talk) 00:35, 4 February 2017 (CET)
The Rahkshi's color was described. And according to the Rahkshi's color and the Kraata variation page: the power of the Rahkshi is the Limited Invulnerability. -- SurelNuva (Talk) 19:59, 4 February 2017 (CET)
Awesome! Could you add a book citation with the page number that describes the Rahkshi's color, so we don't have this discussion again? :P Thanks! --Angel Bob (talk) 20:38, 4 February 2017 (CET)
Added the citations, a lot of them. The page needs rewriting/rephrasing, but it reflects how the characters were sent to the field. -- SurelNuva (Talk) 21:13, 4 February 2017 (CET)
Could you do the rephrasing/rewriting part? I just summed up the things from the books and comics chronologically, but it isn't professional. -- SurelNuva (Talk) 23:08, 4 February 2017 (CET)

couldn't the kahgarak just create another portal and escape the field of shadows? we have no reason to suspect that it did or did not, so i guess we should still leave it listed as a resident of the FoS, but if their rhotuka can get them in, wouldn't they be able to get them out as well? question more for funsies than anything else, i guess. good work on the page, too. Intelligence4 (talk) 00:11, 5 February 2017 (CET)