Difference between revisions of "Talk:Vatuka"

From BIONICLEsector01
(Should this be put under g1 creature)
(Tag: no signature)
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
I was wondering whether this should be put under the creatures category on the main page.
+
I was wondering whether this should be put under the creatures category on the main page. {{unsigned|Firespitter Lhii}}
 +
 
 +
:We define "creature" as an organic animal that originates from Spherus Magna. In this case, the Vatuka is neither a creature nor a Rahi; it is, however, an elemental being, which is what we have a category for. -- {{StaffLink|Dorek}} '''<sub>[[User talk:Dorek|<font color=DARKGREEN>Talk</font>]]</sub>''' <img>https://biosector01.com/images/LUG_Ambassador_LOGO_1_-_2014.png" width="100px</img>  21:05, 26 October 2019 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 21:05, 26 October 2019

I was wondering whether this should be put under the creatures category on the main page. (The preceding unsigned comment was made by Firespitter Lhii)

We define "creature" as an organic animal that originates from Spherus Magna. In this case, the Vatuka is neither a creature nor a Rahi; it is, however, an elemental being, which is what we have a category for. -- Dorek Talk External Image 21:05, 26 October 2019 (UTC)