BIONICLEsector01 talk:Articles for Creation

Shortcut: AFC
From BIONICLEsector01
Revision as of 05:24, 4 March 2021 by Toa Jala (talk | contribs)

Approved proposals (please make these pages!)

BIONICLE Facebook Page

Page will be made.

This wiki should probably have some way of referencing the happenings of the Bionicle Facebook page, which often releases images and videos that are either exclusive or are not released on another source until later and hosts events such as contests. Bionicle websites have articles so it should seem logical that the facebook page should as well. Even if a page is not made, there should be some way of referencing events that unfold on the facebook page as well as images, videos, and other content. This could mean a nav template or a category of some form. Post your thoughts.

Someone wanna get cracking on a sandbox for this? --Angel Bob (talk) 19:47, 31 October 2016 (CET)
Would someone make a sandbox? -- SurelNuva (Talk) 13:06, 14 February 2017 (CET)


Page will be made.

Regardless of exactly what we call it, I feel as though we need a single page for all the obscure merchandising items Bionicle had during it's run, such as the Toa Mahri Dart Shooter or the Sponge Morbuzakh or even the Soft Foam Takadox Mask and Twin Knives, which clearly aren't important enough to deserve pages of their own but could probably be compiled onto a single page. The only issue I can see with this is that some of these are very difficult to find reliable citations for that extend beyond photographs (Otherwise surely there would be some mention of the wearable glow-in-the-dark Piraka teeth on the wiki) --Snaptor (talk) 01:24, 25 September 2017 (CET)

Comments on Merchandise

I think this will be a good page to have - but i think we have to be very careful in drawing the line between regular sets and stuff and all the ancillary merchandise that was available. Intelligence4 (talk) 00:48, 28 September 2017 (CET)

I found a TTV topic that has a huge list of this sort of thing. It obviously wouldn't qualify as an actual source, but it could certainly help as a sort of "checklist" to see exactly what sort of things we're looking for. Are we allowed to link to TTV here? (Also, on a more amusing note, I'm not sure I've seen something gather eight votes this quickly in ages, I was expecting this to be controversial. =P) Snaptor (talk) 11:10, 28 September 2017 (CET)

I just realized this only technically counts as seven votes, oops. Snaptor (talk) 23:49, 28 September 2017 (CET)
MY VOTE COUNTS FOR EVERYTHING -- Dorek Talk External Image 03:39, 29 September 2017 (CET)

Glatorian Action Figure Game

Page will be made.

I was looking this up the other day to remind myself of the rules. For some reason though, there's only a note in the set information for glatorian of all places. It seems strange for it to not have it's own page, or at least it's separate section or sub section on the glatorian page. --"♫We're driving old smokey! Porkchop's at the wheel! When we hit the junk realm, we'll make the drones squeal!♫" ~Prof. Srlojohn 20:07, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

Comments on Glatorian Action Figure Game

so, how many votes are needed to get approval? --"I wanted show that humans are not gods, nor are we monsters, i wanted people to think about what it means to be human" -Lex ~Prof. Srlojohn 19:12, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

Per the rules on BIONICLEsector01:Articles for Creation you need three more votes, unless someone votes no, in which case you need five more. -- Morris the Mata Nui Cow (talk) 22:00, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

Were the rules only ever listed in the back of manuals, or was there a "better" version listed anywhere? --MightBeAlon (talk) 14:34, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

maybe on the website, if not that's it then. Though there were slightly different rules for; single, double, +Agori, and Vehicle. --"I wanted show that humans are not gods, nor are we monsters, i wanted people to think about what it means to be human" -Lex ~Prof. Srlojohn 18:37, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
Makes sense. It might be worth someone scoping out the possible variations between them and compiling the differences, if any, between the potentially different rules on this hypothetical Agori Game page. --MightBeAlon (talk) 18:30, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
agori game? it was just an add on to the normal --"I wanted show that humans are not gods, nor are we monsters, i wanted people to think about what it means to be human" -Lex ~Prof. Srlojohn 18:37, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
Whoops, I meant to call it the Glatorian Game but had a brainfart --MightBeAlon (talk) 18:39, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
The website used to have "interactive" tutorials for each of the four variants (it was like a glorified slideshow, but it explained things pretty well.) I don't know if anybody (BioMediaProject/Wayback Machine) has these preserved? --Snaptor(talk) 23:24, 24 May 2019 (UTC)


Page will be made.

I noticed that we while we do have a gallery for prototypes sets, we do not have a gallery for actual set images. ~ Wolk (talk) 22:09, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

Comments on proposal to create gallery:sets

I'm not opposed, I just don't see anyone willing to do the legwork =P. If someone were to actually create one, I certainly wouldn't complain. -- Dorek Talk External Image 07:23, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

I can give it a shot. I'll need some help on formatting though, so I know what templates an whatnot. --"I wanted show that humans are not gods, nor are we monsters, i wanted people to think about what it means to be human" -Lex ~Prof. Srlojohn 15:22, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

Rename comic articles

Pages will be renamed.

Currently comic articles have the format "Comic issue-number: issue-name" while articles for other media, such as books, follow the format "BIONICLE series-name issue-number: issue-name." For consistency I think we should also use the latter format for comics too. To be clear, we say the series changes when the issue number resets. The format would be:

  • 2001-2005 comics: "BIONICLE issue-number: issue-name" (BIONICLE 1: The Coming of the Toa)
  • 2006-2008 comics: "BIONICLE Ignition issue-number: issue-name" (BIONICLE Ignition 11: Death of a Hero)
    • Note: For 2008 comics, we'd also set up redirects with the format "BIONICLE Battle for Power number: name." That's because the Ignition series was rebranded as Battle for Power during 2008. (The issue number did not reset in 2008, so the 2008 comics are still part of the Ignition series.)
  • 2009-2010 comics: "BIONICLE Glatorian issue-number: issue-name" (BIONICLE Glatorian 6: All That Glitters)

This scheme is consistent and predictable. It leaves out subseries like "Metru Nui" or "Sea of Darkness" because subseries were advertised inconsistently. Instead it only relies on the series name and issue number, which are less ambiguous, so readers can more easily find articles. As an added benefit, this scheme would let us delete silly redirects like Comic 1. -- Morris the Mata Nui Cow (talk) 18:27, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

Comments on renaming comic articles

I noticed that there are no shortcuts like 'C1' or 'IC12', unlike the books. Do we want to add that? ~ Wolk (talk) 01:38, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

Additionally, I've noticed some comics appear to have two (or more?) titles. For example, for Comic 10 is called Powerless! on the wiki, but the cover says The Coming of the Kal! - would we also want to implement redirects for those? ~ Wolk (talk) 13:30, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
Sorry, missed your first comment. If people think the shortcuts will be handy, then sure we can add them in, no AfC required. Also, for comics with multiple titles, yes we should set up redirects. My guess is people tend to know the comics by their cover titles, so any other titles should be redirects. What do you (and others) think? -- Morris the Mata Nui Cow (talk) 19:03, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
In regards to - Personally, I think it looks better without the quotation marks, however I think it would be better worded, for clarities sake, without just an 'or' in that case; something along the lines of 'also known as', 'alternatively titled'? ~ Wolk (talk) 22:16, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Made some changes at Special:PermanentLink/147514. Anyone have additional feedback before moving forward with other articles? -- Morris the Mata Nui Cow (talk) 20:26, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Civil War on Ancient's Homeland

Page will be made.

See above --Gonel (talk) 20:22, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

[see "New Conflict Pages" proposal for more info -- Morris the Mata Nui Cow (talk) 19:16, 19 January 2021 (UTC)]

Rename "Assembler's Villages" to "Assembler's Village"

It doesn't really make sense for the page name to be in plural, in comparison to other pages such as Rahi (Artakha Bull, Stone Rat, etc.), objects (Zamor Launcher), occupations (Crafter). Additionally the BEU entry on page 11 is not in plural. ~ Wolk (talk) 17:58, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Do rename "Assembler's Villages" to "Assembler's Village"

  1. ~ Wolk (talk) 17:58, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
  2. -- Toa Jala Converse 02:18, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Don't rename "Assembler's Villages" to "Assembler's Village"

  1. --"♫We're driving old smokey! Porkchop's at the wheel! When we hit the junk realm, we'll make the drones squeal!♫" ~Prof. Srlojohn 20:52, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
  2. The closest comparison that comes to my mind is Matoran Homes, and that's plural. --Snaptor(talk) 02:24, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
  3. Per Snaptor. -- Morris the Mata Nui Cow (talk) 01:50, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
  4. Same as Snaptor— SurelNuva (Talk) 02:02, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

Comments on renaming "Assembler's Villages"

i say no, because some of the guides say that there are multiple villages spread around Po-metru. --"♫We're driving old smokey! Porkchop's at the wheel! When we hit the junk realm, we'll make the drones squeal!♫" ~Prof. Srlojohn 20:52, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Right, but there are also multiple Zamor Launchers? ~ Wolk (talk) 20:59, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
A long time ago, back when the Vahki staffs were their own pages, there was a conversation about how they were named plurally ("Staffs of Command") while the Rahkshi staffs were named singularly ("Staff of Anger"). Somebody told me it was because each single Vahki had multiple staffs, but each single Rahkshi had only one staff. Not sure how to apply that to this, but thought it was worth mentioning. Is it accurate to describe this page as about the Assembler's Villages as a collective unit? -- Master Inika (Talk) 21:25, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

To expand on the comment I made in my vote; this seems to be a common trend for "plural locations". Chute Stations, Sea Gates, and Stalactite Villages are all examples of this, in addition to Matoran Homes that I mentioned above. If we really want to make this change, it really should be an all-or-nothing attempt, which is why I voted against just renaming the Assembler's Villages. I would be more open to a full renaming of plural locations, but would still need to hear the arguments. --Snaptor(talk) 23:27, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

Split Fenrakk into Fenrakk Spawn and Fenrakk

Split Fenrakk into Fenrakk Spawn and Kardas

  1. BIONICLE Encyclopedia's entry is called Kardas. -- Morris the Mata Nui Cow (talk) 18:36, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  2. Makes sense, we could make Kardas Dragon into a redirect and Fenrakk into a disambiguation page. ~ Wolk (talk) 19:08, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
  3. Same as Wolk.— SurelNuva (Talk) 09:47, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
  4. --maxim21 06:44, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
  5. ~~Chalk33

Split Fenrakk into Fenrakk Spawn and Kardas Dragon

Leave it as-is

  1. -- Toa Jala Converse 05:24, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Comments on proposal to split Fenrakk into Fenrakk Spawn and Fenrakk/Kardas/Kardas Dragon

I do get the Ussal page comparison, but I gotta say I'm not really feeling this. It's a confusing enough situation as it is; they were introduced to the audience as "Fenrakk" and then "Fenrakk Spawn" but the Fenrakk Spawn are basically the original, even though that's not what the name implies at all? I think it's fine as is. -- Dorek Talk External Image 17:24, 31 August 2019 (UTC)

Yeah Fenrakk spawn is a misnomer. I suspect it's an out-of-universe nickname, but there's no confirmation for that afaik. Regardless, if we don't split the page up, we should at least move it to "Fenrakk Spawn" since that's the actual subject of the article. The current setup is analogous to calling the Ash Bear article "Graalok." -- Morris the Mata Nui Cow (talk) 22:12, 31 August 2019 (UTC)
My understanding (admittedly this is an uncertain topic) is that the "Fenrakk Spawn Spiders" are distinct from ordinary "Fenrakk" which are distinct again from Vezon's specific Fenrakk (which I think we should refer to as Kardas, it the same sense that we say Takanuva and not Takua). --Snaptor(talk) 10:47, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
Actually the BEU says that the Ignika enlarged a Fenrakk Spawn into Vezon's Fenrakk. — SurelNuva (Talk) 19:39, 8 November 2019 (UTC)

BIONICLE Adventures Sampler

Here's a somewhat unusual suggestion: I know Dorek had previously mentioned that he was hoping to work on forming some sort of section for novel boxed sets and/or set packs, but the BIONICLE Adventures Sampler (which I was just recently able to get my hands on) is a unique publication that was technically released as part of a boxed set in the Special Edition Ta-Metru Collector Pack. The book itself is 70 pages, consisting of the prologue and first chapter of each of the first four Adventures novels and has an ISBN of 0439734606--I've uploaded an image of the full cover for reference. Not really sure what this would be categorized as, so I'll just nominate it for a page here and see what is suggested. --Gonel (talk) 22:49, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

Create BIONICLE Adventures Sampler

  1. --Gonel (talk) 22:49, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

Don't Create BIONICLE Adventures Sampler

Host BIONICLE Adventures Sampler on Boxed/Packaged Set Page

Comments on BIONICLE Adventures Sampler

I had always assumed that was BIONICLE Adventures 1 just because of the color scheme and never really paid attention, hah. I'm still going to say it's more for a section on the BA page (same reason we don't have individual pages for every mini guidebook), but I'm not fussed either way. -- Dorek Talk External Image 02:43, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

Makes sense. Assuming nothing changes between now and whenever I get to it, I'll try to knock that out, as well as the aforementioned boxed sets (assuming I'm not beaten to them). --Gonel (talk) 05:15, 24 July 2020 (UTC)

Is there a specific page you're planning to host this on if it doesn't get its own page? -- Toa Jala Converse 05:24, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

New Conflict Pages

While I was consolidating our events pages, I realized that we don't have a page for either the Battle with the Kanohi Dragon or the final battle in the Toa-Dark Hunter War. This seems strange given how BS01 has pages for conflicts even so minor as the Battle at the Bone Hunter Camp, yet for something so significant as these two battles, there are no pages. For a direct comparison, we have a page for the Order of Mata Nui-Brotherhood of Makuta War as well as for the Siege of Metru Nui. Yet despite having a page for the T-DH War, these two major battles have nothing.

Reviewing the events list, the Civil Wars on Zakaz and Ancient's homeland also jump out as arguably significant enough events (especially in terms of the sorts of pages we already have) to warrant their own pages. There are plenty of others that, by the standing precedents, could logically warrant some action (or perhaps we could move to delete some of the minor battles...) but I'll just post these four for now. You can see the full list of event pages here. --Gonel (talk) 20:22, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Battle with the Kanohi Dragon

See above --Gonel (talk) 20:22, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Make Battle with the Kanohi Dragon

  1. --Gonel (talk) 20:22, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
  2. -- Morris the Mata Nui Cow (talk) 05:19, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
  3. --maxim21 06:44, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
  4. This event featured known characters, altered the Matoran universe's history, is documented in a novel, and has additional references and notes to include. Seems like a no-brainer. --Angel Bob (talk) 04:30, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
  5. ~ Wolk (talk) 04:37, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
  6. ~~Chalk33
  7. --ToaOfSnow(talk) 11:15, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
  8. -- Toa Jala Converse 05:24, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Don't Make Battle with the Kanohi Dragon

Comments on Battle with the Kanohi Dragon

Defeat of the Dark Hunters

See above --Gonel (talk) 20:22, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Make Defeat of the Dark Hunters

  1. --Gonel (talk) 20:22, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
  2. Not a fan of the name, but this could use a page. --maxim21 06:44, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
  3. I think it's a good idea--certainly it was a highly significant event. --User:ToaOfGallifrey
  4. ~~Chalk33

Don't Make Defeat of the Dark Hunters

  1. This wasn't really an event distinct from the Toa-DH war - it wasn't even a battle, it was just a series of surprise reinforcements and a surrender. It's not insignificant by any means, but I don't feel like it's distinct enough from the war itself to belong anywhere other than that article. --ToaOfSnow(talk) 11:15, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
  2. I'm with Morris and Snow. -- Toa Jala Converse 05:24, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Comments on Defeat of the Dark Hunters

I think a page for this could work, but also we could just expand the "Nidhiki's Betrayal" section on the Toa-DH War page. -- Morris the Mata Nui Cow (talk) 05:19, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

This is a compelling suggestion. I could go either way on this one. --Angel Bob (talk) 04:30, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
I can certainly change the name (though the current one is in the style of most BS01 event pages), but overall, I think this one is one I'd love to make a page, especially with all the back-and-forth going on leading up to this final battle and since two stories cover the various complexities of the events. There's also some fun aftermath worth covering, such as the fact that Nidhiki and the other DHs would later camp out in the very canyon where the Dark Hunters were defeated. --Gonel (talk) 19:50, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

I think one point worth making about this nomination is that if you look at Category|Events (tried linking it, but it won't let me for some reason), BS01 has accumulated a listing of almost a hundred various events. Many of these are battles or wars, but just as many are more mundane listings such as Energy Storms or Study of Energized Protodermis or My LEGO Network BIONICLE Campaign, none of which were events especially notable in themselves and which were generally subsections of larger arcs. I actually expected this particular nomination to pass the fastest of these four considering it and the events surrounding it portrayed directly in two different stories, described in several more, and altered the course of history. If pages such as these three warrant pages, I think this event at least could afford one. --Gonel (talk) 03:54, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Zakaz Civil War

See above --Gonel (talk) 20:22, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Make Zakaz Civil War

  1. --Gonel (talk) 20:22, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
  2. Idk if we'd have much info for this, but yeah since we have some already have pages for some pretty small events it seems fine. -- Morris the Mata Nui Cow (talk) 05:19, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
  3. --maxim21 06:44, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
  4. --Count Pewku (talk) 04:34, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
  5. ~ Wolk (talk) 04:37, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
  6. --ToaOfSnow(talk) 11:15, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Don't Make Zakaz Civil War

  1. From what I understand, there's very little information about it.-- Toa Jala Converse 05:24, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Comments on Zakaz Civil War

Do we have any specific events that are included in the Zakaz Civil War? Are any of the Piraka's origin stories attached to them? I would be interested in making this page if it would have useful information on it. --Angel Bob (talk)

The article on Zakaz says that Reidak was actually the one who started the war, when a "minor dispute with local officials" led to him destroying a sizable part of a city. Reidak's page, however, contradicts this, saying that the war he started was actually on the smaller island off Zakaz's coast which he lived on. There's some ambiguity.
I was under the impression (perhaps erroneously) that Zakaz was in a constant state of civil war. Not much of the island's history is known. Given the nature of the Skakdi, I imagine it would be hard to pinpoint where one war ended and the next began. It fits well on the Zakaz page. -- Toa Jala Converse 05:24, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Civil War on Ancient's Homeland

See above --Gonel (talk) 20:22, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Page will be made.


I think there's enough information on Mutation as a power to give it its own page, which I've been working on here. There's still stuff to add, but I think as it is right now is enough to make a case for it. Dag (talk) 03:47, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Make Mutation Page

  1. This could work. ~ Wolk (talk) 06:48, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
  2. Looks good to me. This power has way more examples than say, Anger. Chuckeroo777 (talk) 19:08, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
  3. ~~Chalk33
  4. Solid sandbox, bro.-- Toa Jala Converse 05:24, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Don't Make Mutation Page

Comments on Mutation

I guess the only thing that bothers me is that Mutation ends up being more of a concept then a power half the time; Visorak don't have the power of "mutation", they produce a venom that mutates, which is a distinction I feel might get lost in a full page. -- Dorek Talk External Image 06:17, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

I agree, but that's fixable. Replace "Visorak" with "Hordika Venom" and I'm on board. -- Toa Jala Converse 05:24, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Behind the Scenes sections

This is a suggestion I've seen brought up by a couple people but I haven't seen them bring it up on the Wiki, so figured I'd see it's popularity.

The suggestion is to add behind the scenes sections/subheadings to most pages, detailing real-life aspects, such as origiks and inspirations for the charactes (like we have for Annona) or locations (like Mata Nui) or how they were developed or altered from original plans, possibly detailing contridictions, retcons and/or uncertaonties, etc. There might be other things as well that could fit into the category. In most cases, I'm not sure there is much know to warrant these, so I'd perhaps keep them to pages where there is something to say. ~ Wolk (talk) 06:43, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

Add Behind the Scenes sections

  1. ~ Wolk (talk) 06:43, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
  2. Count Pewku (talk) 17:35, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
  3. --maxim21 06:30, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
  4. Yeah, one weakness of BS01 is that articles tend not to acknowledge discrepancies (like if info gets retconned, articles just cite the later source and ignore the earlier one). If articles acknowledged ambiguity, BS01 would provide a more accurate picture of canon. Behind the scenes sections would be a good way of doing that. These sections could also be a good place to allow a bit of speculation as to why certain retcons, etc. happened, so long as we clearly indicate what's speculation. Based on feedback and users' edits in the past, there does seem to be some interest in that kind of editorializing/analysis, but there isn't a good place for it currently. -- Morris the Mata Nui Cow (talk) 20:52, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
  5. ~~Chalk33
  6. It needs a better name - something (maybe a bit quirky) that suggests the section is referring to information distinct from the Bionicle universe. Placement within articles would be equally important - it needs to be clearly separate from canon or "in-universe" stuff. This would also be a pretty significant undertaking as it's honestly among the very few areas that BS01 kind of hasn't documented super well. And it would additionally require much more thought to be put into the writing in order for it to retain the objective, very factual presentation that BS01 excels in. All that said, it's a great idea - perhaps I'm just a little sceptical as to its ability to be realised. Still has my vote. --ToaOfSnow(talk) 11:22, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
  7. --Gonel (talk) 22:54, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  8. I feel like Trivia (although maybe not on every page) serves as this already, so I'm not sure if this should be implemented as a different section entirely or added onto Trivia. Either way, I would like to see this added in some way. Dag (talk) 22:59, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  9. Haven't noticed this yet, but I definitely like the idea.--Surel (Talk) 23:04, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
  10. Heck yeah!-- Toa Jala Converse 05:24, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Don't add Behind the Scenes sections


It's an interesting idea. I like to think Trivia encompasses a fair amount (and anything more detailed probably belongs on a more real-world oriented media page) but we could possibly redevelop what we consider "Trivia" as well. Could you maybe do a mock-up to show what it would look like? -- Dorek Talk External Image 06:15, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

While I'd also like to see a mock-up of what it would look like, I feel like a lot of the sort of information we'd be looking at would be far too niche to belong on any real-world oriented media pages that I'm aware of. BS01 already covers some things like this (such as "Real People" like Greg Farshtey) so I don't think it's outside the scope of the wiki. And Trivia should remain stuff that really is trivial and doesn't belong elsewhere. --ToaOfSnow(talk) 11:30, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Chronicles of Takua

The Chronicles of Takua are an in-universe compendium that is frequently referenced in BIONICLE's first half. Several narratives throughout the media include essays that are cited as having been directly pulled from it. These include;

  • The essay "Beware the Infected Kanohi" in the BIONICLE Collector's Sticker Book
  • The essay "The Origin of the Bohrok-Kal" in Comic 10: Powerless!
  • The narrative "Origin of the Rahaga" in the Appendix of Web of Shadows
  • The Wall of History articles, although not expressly stated as having been pulled from the "Chronicles of Takua" are still examples of his work

Ideally it would be fun to include these essays on the page, but if that's not possible it would at least be worthwhile to at least denote the collection.

For Chronicles of Takua

  1. --Gonel (talk) 03:20, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
  2. --Surel (Talk) 13:04, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
  3. -- Toa Jala Converse 05:24, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Against Chronicles of Takua

Comments on Chronicles of Takua

Hmm, I do like that they all have the same sort of narrative link, but given how far apart they all are I'm not sure if a single page would be well served. Given that we're mostly relying on WoH (the site) for the novels, and we have copies of the comics, maybe just an individual article/section for the Sticker book excerpt? -- Dorek Talk External Image 18:38, 22 January 2021 (UTC)