Difference between revisions of "BIONICLEsector01 talk:Articles for Creation"

Shortcut: AFC
From BIONICLEsector01
m (Yes)
m (No)
Line 36: Line 36:
 
#Meh... [[User:Toa Obitor|<font color="ForestGreen" face="Segoe Script" size="4">'''Obitor'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Toa Obitor|<font color="ForestGreen" face="Segoe Print" size="2">('''Talk''')</font>]]</sup> 09:52, 17 January 2015 (CET)
 
#Meh... [[User:Toa Obitor|<font color="ForestGreen" face="Segoe Script" size="4">'''Obitor'''</font>]] <sup>[[User talk:Toa Obitor|<font color="ForestGreen" face="Segoe Print" size="2">('''Talk''')</font>]]</sup> 09:52, 17 January 2015 (CET)
 
#--[[User:Maxim21|<font color="goldenrod">maxim21</font>]] 09:58, 17 January 2015 (CET)
 
#--[[User:Maxim21|<font color="goldenrod">maxim21</font>]] 09:58, 17 January 2015 (CET)
 +
#mrehhhhhh [[User:Proto|<font color="black">Proto</font>]] [[User_talk:Proto|<sup><font color="black">talk</font></sup>]] 01:46, 18 January 2015 (CET)
  
 
===Comments===
 
===Comments===

Revision as of 00:46, 18 January 2015


Nuvapedia

I don't have a Sandbox, mainly because I know nothing about our newest partners except that they speak French, but isn't that a good reason to make a page? Let's find out things about these guys! Inevitable precedence justification: we have one for Chronist-Wiki. ζoxHistories External Image

Yes

Page will be made.

Comments

I would lean towards a soft "no". I know Chronist-Wiki does have a page, but I feel like they have more their place in the mainspace, being a part of Der Chronist (which organized canon contests as IDBM). The Nuvapedia, on the other side, didn't have any influence on the story. --maxim21 09:36, 19 December 2014 (CET)

Currently the big things on the Chronist page are the basic history of the wiki and the fact that we be partnered with them. By that measure, NP ought to fit. This info about Der Chronist and IDBM, on the other hand, is new info to me. Do we have that recorded somewhere? If not, I know which Mainspace page it ought to go on...
This never ended up happening before AfC came back (because lazy), but there was also gonna be a TTV page due to our closeness with them, and I don't recall TTV organizing contests. If neither this nor a TTV page happen, what might you say to a BIONICLEsector01:Partners type of page being nominated? Here I shall also send out brainwaves and try to draw staff in to get the official side on what happened with the TTV page not happening. ζoxHistories External Image
The fact IDBM evolved into Der Chronist isn't recorded anywhere here, I think. That's on CW, though. As for the canon tidbit it created, IDBM is cited on the concerned pages. (Kyry for example). Not sure if that's clear, but IDBM stands for the german of Unofficial German BIONICLE Magazine, BTW.
Personnaly, I would find a BIONICLEsector01:Partners page better, yes.
On a side note, the usual acronym for Nuvapedia is NIE - Nuvapedia being initially another acronym for the full name Nuva Independent Encyclopedia that finished taking the place of the full name. --maxim21 12:04, 19 December 2014 (CET)

Alright, so this got the requisite votes while I wasn't looking: discussion, should it go ahead as a page for NIE, or should we do it as the start of a BS01: Partners page? Either way, there will need to be some gathering of history, of data about the current state of NIE, in order to make a page (this was something I was hoping someone might volunteer for =3 though I guess I should go searching and interviewing, being the unofficial Chronicler and all). ζoxHistories External Image

I did a (not so) quick resume of NIE history on my sandbox. (Probably horrible grammar and phrasing, and too much details by moments, but that should help. If there's any question, I guess I should be able to answer them. --maxim21 19:59, 4 January 2015 (CET)

Rough Sandbox over here. ζoxHistories External Image

Some little things: I forgot to mention it, but in june 2013 the decision to made the revoke the "exclusivity" of the NIE on storyline conversations - notably because that had proven to be actually harmful and the story was nearly no more discussed on the french fandom. I added the staff history; the exact date of Geek7734 promotion has been recorded nowhere, so I just put a rough estimate. --maxim21 12:52, 5 January 2015 (CET)

Ice Shield (Kopaka Nuva) and Feet Additions (Pohatu Nuva)

Looking to split the Nuva versions of those two tools away from Ice Shield and Feet Additions. They would end up moved to Ice Shield (Kopaka) and Feet Additions (Pohatu) and disambiguations made at the original titles. •Shine 02:24, 16 January 2015 (CET)

Yes

  1. Shine 02:24, 16 January 2015 (CET)
  2. I guess I'll have to get used to shorter pages regardless, unless the new story takes a massive upswing in complexity. --Master of the Rahkshi Ask, and ye shall receive. Eventually. 03:02, 16 January 2015 (CET)
  3. It makes sense--Gresh113, Glatorian of Air (talk) 07:11, 16 January 2015 (CET)
  4. --~|RC|~ (Talk/Contribs) 16:28, 17 January 2015 (CET)
  5. -- Dorek Talk External Image 21:17, 17 January 2015 (CET)
  6. I was torn about this, but Dorek's got a point. --Vartemp Talk 22:38, 17 January 2015 (CET)

No

  1. You want to make separate pages for the Nuva versions of these tools, right? Sorry, but I really don't see the need. There's nothing so markedly different about those "upgraded" tools that merits anything more than a one-sentence mention. --Angel Bob (talk) 04:06, 16 January 2015 (CET)
  2. The Nuva versions of these weapons have the same traits as their predecessors save for some enhanced strength. I don't think that's enough to warrant an article. --Collector1100 (talk) 04:48, 16 January 2015 (CET)
  3. Exact same function, minor appearance differences and general "increase in strength". I'd say yes if their functions or names were at all different but alas. LockmanCapulet Crusty relics! 17:30, 16 January 2015 (CET)
  4. Meh... Obitor (Talk) 09:52, 17 January 2015 (CET)
  5. --maxim21 09:58, 17 January 2015 (CET)
  6. mrehhhhhh Proto talk 01:46, 18 January 2015 (CET)

Comments

Hrm... I guess? -- Dorek Talk External Image 02:53, 16 January 2015 (CET)

Yeah, I wasn't sure either. I just don't like the way they're done currently. •Shine 02:54, 16 January 2015 (CET)
Thought about it for a bit, gonna say yes. I mean, just because they use similar pieces doesn't mean they're literally the "same" tool. Kopaka's Shield especially; although the page says it can, I don't recall the first shield ever actually being used for snowboarding, and it looks different, so a change in function and appearance are all that really separate the tool pages, no? -- Dorek Talk External Image 21:17, 17 January 2015 (CET)