Template talk:SetBox: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 19:30, 9 September 2017

Usage

Can we consider only using the SetBox template on pages with more than one set? It's very helpful for pages that need to list 2-6 sets at once, but when there's just one set, it looks tacky as all heck, and creates a bunch of dead space in the middle of the page (e.g. Storm Beasts). For pages with just one set, I would suggest just linking to the set page in the Set Information section. Does anybody disagree? --Angel Bob (talk) 00:26, 21 November 2016 (CET)

Not to dig up a year old topic or anything, but... sure? Moreover, did we stop using this, or did it just never get widely implemented? It's on some pages, but not a lot; could definitely stand to be on more. -- Dorek _Talk External Image

20:30, 9 September 2017 (CET)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+==Usage==
 Can we consider only using the SetBox template on pages with more than one set? It's very helpful for pages that need to list 2-6 sets at once, but when there's just one set, it looks tacky as all heck, and creates a bunch of dead space in the middle of the page (e.g. [[Storm Beasts]]). For pages with just one set, I would suggest just linking to the set page in the Set Information section. Does anybody disagree? --[[User:Angel Bob|Angel Bob]] ([[User talk:Angel Bob|talk]]) 00:26, 21 November 2016 (CET)
+:Not to dig up a year old topic or anything, but... sure? Moreover, did we stop using this, or did it just never get widely implemented? It's on some pages, but not a lot; could definitely stand to be on more. -- {{StaffLink|Dorek}} '''<sub>[[User talk:Dorek|<font color=DARKGREEN>Talk</font>]]</sub>''' <img>http://biosector01.com/images/LUG_Ambassador_LOGO_1_-_2014.png" width="100px</img>  20:30, 9 September 2017 (CET)