Talk:Kraahkan

From BIONICLEsector01

Immoral

I'd sort of file that under "no duh", personally. -- Dorek Talk External Image 18:07, 4 December 2014 (CET)

Should we have a separate page that lists immoral Kanohi?--Gresh113, Toa of Air (talk) 21:30, 4 December 2014 (CET)

Or at least a catergory--Gresh113, Toa of Air (talk) 22:53, 4 December 2014 (CET)

Ooh, good idea! Personally, I'd file an Immoral Kanohi category under "no duh". --Angel Bob (talk) 23:51, 4 December 2014 (CET)
A category would be an interesting idea... AfC it.
The idea of immoral Kanohi is patently ridiculous, but since it keeps being a thing, might as well. I just thought the Kraahkan was very obviously one because it's power is evil incarnate. The original trivia points were included specifically because explanation was needed to elaborate as to why (because, as mentioned, the whole idea falls apart the more you think about it). -- Dorek Talk External Image 07:01, 5 December 2014 (CET)

But remember, Makuta wear Kanohi too, it's not just Toa--Gresh113, Toa of Air (talk) 14:40, 5 December 2014 (CET)

Enslaved Matoran

Does anyone know where has the information that the Kraahkan were made by enslaved Matoran came from? I only found info on the Toa Hagah's masks were made by enslaved matoran.— SurelNuva (Talk) 12:49, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

The first encyclopedia. Added the reference. Master Inika (Talk) 15:19, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Ah, thanks! I didn't read or have the original, and the updated version doesn't mention it, because the Bionicle: World revealed that it was actually made on Artakha, between the two encyclopedia releases.— SurelNuva (Talk) 16:19, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

Pakari + Vahi

Does anyone have a reference for that trivia point? It seems plausible and certainly explains a lot, but I've never heard it before. Master Inika (Talk) 04:17, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

It's basically the pieces of prototype makuta found on ebay combined with the concept arts.--Surel (Talk) 06:28, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Mask of Power

I saw the Ultimate Dume version being referred to as the Mask of Power on the latest Mask of Destiny post, which sounded familar. Bricklink also identifies it as being called the Mask of Power. Neither the set description for 10202 Ultimate Dume from the Sep-Oct 04 Magzine or Shop@Home mention this. I also considered it being on the box, but it is at very least not mentioned on the front. Any idea where it may be from? ~ Wolk (talk) 18:17, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

Bricklink isn't really a good source for these things as they just use whatever terminology they think of in the moment, and nothing about MoD trying to sell you something should be construed as an official thing either. Is there any particular reason why it needs to be called a Mask of Power? -- Dorek Talk 22:48, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
No, if it's a fabrication or misinterpretation by Bricklink, then that's that. Yes, Bricklink is horrible as a source for this stuff, I'm mostly just curious where they got that idea from; i.e. if it was advertised as such somewhere.
On another note, per Peeron, it sounds like the "exclusive" mask was included in Set:8713... http://www.peeron.com/inv/sets/8713-1 ~ Wolk (talk) 23:46, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
It was referred to as a "mask", I just dunno if the specific phrase "mask of power" was used. Also it is entirely possible that it was included in that bucket, but I'm not sure if Peeron's inventory is necessarily accurate either. And I think some of those tubs got different parts depending on what was in stock anyway, so might have been a fluke. But then again given that the set was TRU exclusive maybe that was the only way Europe could get it, idk. I would need some other corroboration first though. -- Dorek Talk 04:47, 23 September 2022 (UTC)