Talk:Treespeak
From BIONICLEsector01
Revision as of 22:02, 9 August 2017 by HarsulinsGhost (talk | contribs)
Move to Treespeak?
This is the same thing like Takua/Takanuva to me. I think, we should change it. --Fippede 19:43, 16 July 2014 (CEST)
Hapka's Treespeak
Should we add the treespeak words from Hapka's books or they are non-canon? Hapka had a bad hait of not using dashes between the merged words (she wrote wayfinder instead of way-finder) Also, that's 100% that every words are there from the comics & Farshtey books? — Surel—Nuva (Talk) 19:26, 6 August 2017 (CET)
- I was under the impression that the books series was all canon.--Harsulin's Ghost (talk) 23:19, 7 August 2017 (CET)
- The Hapka books have some non canon stuff or things which contradicts to the real canon, her books are considered semi canon. — Surel—Nuva (Talk) 23:52, 7 August 2017 (CET)
- Ah, that's true, Greg did change how the shadow toa were defeated later on for example, but if that's the case, I have no idea how were supposed to know which treespeak words are canon.--Harsulin's Ghost (talk) 02:14, 9 August 2017 (CET)
- Probably the ones which are featured in the MNOG/MNOG2, the comics and the Farshtey releated media. But the Hapka ones could be canon too, but I ain't sure about it... — Surel—Nuva (Talk) 09:40, 9 August 2017 (CET)
- Ah, that's true, Greg did change how the shadow toa were defeated later on for example, but if that's the case, I have no idea how were supposed to know which treespeak words are canon.--Harsulin's Ghost (talk) 02:14, 9 August 2017 (CET)
- Yeah I was thinking MNOG was good source of verification, but as far as words only appearing in Hapka's novels, it seems to me like they should be added because they don't contradict anything we know is canon.--Harsulin's Ghost (talk) 23:02, 9 August 2017 (CET)