Talk:Treespeak: Difference between revisions

From BIONICLEsector01
Line 6: Line 6:


:I was under the impression that the books series was all canon.--[[User:HarsulinsGhost|Harsulin's Ghost]] ([[User talk:HarsulinsGhost|talk]]) 23:19, 7 August 2017 (CET)
:I was under the impression that the books series was all canon.--[[User:HarsulinsGhost|Harsulin's Ghost]] ([[User talk:HarsulinsGhost|talk]]) 23:19, 7 August 2017 (CET)
::he Hapka books have some non canon stuff or things which contradicts to the real canon, her books are considered semi canon. — '''''[[User:Surel-nuva|<font color="DARKBLUE">Surel</font><font color="DARKRED">—</font><font color="GOLDENROD">Nuva</font>]]'' <sub>([[User talk:Surel-nuva|<font color="#8A7F8D">Talk</font>]])</sub>''' 23:52, 7 August 2017 (CET)

Revision as of 22:52, 7 August 2017

Move to Treespeak?

This is the same thing like Takua/Takanuva to me. I think, we should change it. --Fippede 19:43, 16 July 2014 (CEST)

Hapka's Treespeak

Should we add the treespeak words from Hapka's books or they are non-canon? Hapka had a bad hait of not using dashes between the merged words (she wrote wayfinder instead of way-finder) Also, that's 100% that every words are there from the comics & Farshtey books? — SurelNuva (Talk) 19:26, 6 August 2017 (CET)

I was under the impression that the books series was all canon.--Harsulin's Ghost (talk) 23:19, 7 August 2017 (CET)
he Hapka books have some non canon stuff or things which contradicts to the real canon, her books are considered semi canon. — SurelNuva (Talk) 23:52, 7 August 2017 (CET)