BIONICLEsector01 talk:Articles for Deletion

Shortcut: AFD

4/6 Toa Hagah Spears

Look at the pages - there is nothing listed on these pages that is not already listed on the relevant Toa's pages. The Seismic Spear has the most information out of all of them, but it still barely says anything about the weapon. As much as I would like to have more information about them, these pages are redundant and don't contribute anything to the wiki. --Angel Bob (talk) 22:54, 12 April 2017 (CET)

Delete 4/6 of the spears

Keep the spears

Make one page for all the spears

  1. It overal looks like the better way to go. ~OnionShark 07:45, 31 May 2017 (CET)
  2. I agree --WOLKsite (talk) 00:51, 2 June 2017 (CET)
  3. This is a smart move. Changing my vote. --Angel Bob (talk) 03:39, 2 June 2017 (CET)
  4. I'm for either keep the pages or this, and this seems to have more momentum. --777stairs (talk) 15:57, 2 June 2017 (CET)
  5. Hagah spears sounds good to me — SurelNuva (Talk) 22:50, 2 June 2017 (CET)
  6. --- Creep 23:15, 2 June 2017 (CET)
  7. There's honestly a lot of weapon groups we should do this for. --Master Inika (Talk) 01:37, 7 June 2017 (CET)
  8. --Harsulin's Ghost (talk) 01:06, 22 June 2017 (CET)

Comments

I'm inclined to agree with you, but i think if we delete four of the pages, the other two should go as well - we could just move all the content we have on them to their relevant toa pages, under the masks and tools section or whatever. i just think it'd be weird to delete four of them and leave two there. Intelligence4 (talk) 17:43, 17 April 2017 (CET)

Or we could make a page for the Hagah weapons like we did for the Rahaga staffs. ~OnionShark 21:53, 17 April 2017 (CET)
I don't agree at all. Lava Spear and Cyclone Spear have images, Set Information, and Example Usages - more than enough to qualify for a page. The other four spears have none of this. We shouldn't be making decisions like this based on an all-or-nothing school of thought. If you think it would be too "weird" to have only two weapons for the Toa Hagah in Template:ToolsNav, we could easily keep the names in the navbox, and just set them up to link to their respective Toa pages' Mask and Tools sections.
I would also oppose making a page for all 6 weapons (for one, what would we even call the page?). Rahaga Staffs works because each of the weapons has an individual power, but not enough specific information to qualify for a page. The Avalanche Spear, etc. have nothing but their names. There just isn't enough info to justify listing these 4 anywhere but their respective Toa pages. --Angel Bob (talk) 22:51, 17 April 2017 (CET)
I think the information we have on the two spears is short enough that we could put it on the toa pages - set information, for one thing, isn't really independent, since they only came as part of the toa sets. Intelligence4 (talk) 19:43, 26 April 2017 (CET)
Or we could create a page that just covers all six spears-don't a couple of the G2 weapons have something like that going?--Wiriamu (talk) 21:11, 30 May 2017 (CET)

I already suggested this and it does look like a good idea, I added it as a third option. ~OnionShark 07:43, 31 May 2017 (CET)

I still think that we should merge the page with their respective toa pages, since we have a section on each of those pages for the toa's tools anyway, but you can count my vote for just merging the pages into one if we need to push it over the limit to get it done. Intelligence4 (talk) 23:07, 2 June 2017 (CET)
I think it is definitely a good idea to merge these pages into one, and to possibly do something similar for a number of other pages as well.--Harsulin's Ghost (talk) 01:09, 22 June 2017 (CET)
Return to the project page "Articles for Deletion".