BIONICLEsector01 talk:Articles for Deletion
4/6 Toa Hagah Spears
Look at the pages - there is nothing listed on these pages that is not already listed on the relevant Toa's pages. The Seismic Spear has the most information out of all of them, but it still barely says anything about the weapon. As much as I would like to have more information about them, these pages are redundant and don't contribute anything to the wiki. --Angel Bob (talk) 22:54, 12 April 2017 (CET)
I'm inclined to agree with you, but i think if we delete four of the pages, the other two should go as well - we could just move all the content we have on them to their relevant toa pages, under the masks and tools section or whatever. i just think it'd be weird to delete four of them and leave two there. Intelligence4 (talk) 17:43, 17 April 2017 (CET)
- Or we could make a page for the Hagah weapons like we did for the Rahaga staffs. ~OnionShark 21:53, 17 April 2017 (CET)
- I don't agree at all. Lava Spear and Cyclone Spear have images, Set Information, and Example Usages - more than enough to qualify for a page. The other four spears have none of this. We shouldn't be making decisions like this based on an all-or-nothing school of thought. If you think it would be too "weird" to have only two weapons for the Toa Hagah in Template:ToolsNav, we could easily keep the names in the navbox, and just set them up to link to their respective Toa pages' Mask and Tools sections.
- I would also oppose making a page for all 6 weapons (for one, what would we even call the page?). Rahaga Staffs works because each of the weapons has an individual power, but not enough specific information to qualify for a page. The Avalanche Spear, etc. have nothing but their names. There just isn't enough info to justify listing these 4 anywhere but their respective Toa pages. --Angel Bob (talk) 22:51, 17 April 2017 (CET)