BIONICLEsector01 talk:Articles for Deletion: Difference between revisions

Shortcut: AFD
From BIONICLEsector01
(31 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Shortcut|AFD}}
{{Shortcut|AFD}}
== 4/6 Toa Hagah Spears ==
[[Seismic Spear|Look]] [[Sub-Zero Spear|at]] [[Tidal Spear|the]] [[Avalanche Spear|pages]] - there is nothing listed on these pages that is not already listed on the relevant Toa's pages. The Seismic Spear has the most information out of all of them, but it still barely says anything about the weapon. As much as I would like to have more information about them, these pages are redundant and don't contribute anything to the wiki. --[[User:Angel Bob|Angel Bob]] ([[User talk:Angel Bob|talk]]) 22:54, 12 April 2017 (CET)
===Delete 4/6 of the spears===
===Keep the spears===
=== Make one page for all the spears ===
# It overal looks like the better way to go. '''[[User:OnionShark|<font color="black">~</font><font color="castletongreen">OnionShark</font>]]''' 07:45, 31 May 2017 (CET)
# I agree --[[User:WOLKsite|WOLKsite]] ([[User talk:WOLKsite|talk]]) 00:51, 2 June 2017 (CET)
# This is a smart move. Changing my vote. --[[User:Angel Bob|Angel Bob]] ([[User talk:Angel Bob|talk]]) 03:39, 2 June 2017 (CET)
# I'm for either keep the pages or this, and this seems to have more momentum. --[[User:777stairs|777stairs]] ([[User talk:777stairs|talk]]) 15:57, 2 June 2017 (CET)
# Hagah spears sounds good to me — '''[[User:Surel-nuva|<font color="DARKBLUE">Surel</font><font color="DARKRED">—</font><font color="GOLDENROD">Nuva</font>]] <small>([[User talk:Surel-nuva|<font color="#8A7F8D">''Talk''</font>]])</small>''' 22:50, 2 June 2017 (CET)
# --- '''[[User:Creep Of The Deep|<font color="blue">Creep</font>]]''' 23:15, 2 June 2017 (CET)
# There's honestly a lot of weapon groups we should do this for. --<font color="PaleTurquoise" Style="background:Black">[[User:Master Inika|<font color="PaleTurquoise">Master Inika]]</font><small><sup>  ([[User talk:Master Inika|<font color="PaleTurquoise">Talk</font>]]) </sup></small></font> 01:37, 7 June 2017 (CET)
#--[[User:HarsulinsGhost|Harsulin&#39;s Ghost]] ([[User talk:HarsulinsGhost|talk]]) 01:06, 22 June 2017 (CET)
===Comments on the Hagah Spears===
I'm inclined to agree with you, but i think if we delete four of the pages, the other two should go as well - we could just move all the content we have on them to their relevant toa pages, under the masks and tools section or whatever. i just think it'd be weird to delete four of them and leave two there. [[User:Intelligence4|Intelligence4]] ([[User talk:Intelligence4|talk]]) 17:43, 17 April 2017 (CET)
:Or we could make a page for the Hagah weapons like we did for the Rahaga staffs. '''[[User:OnionShark|<font color="black">~</font><font color="castletongreen">OnionShark</font>]]''' 21:53, 17 April 2017 (CET)
::I don't agree at all. [[Lava Spear]] and [[Cyclone Spear]] have images, Set Information, and Example Usages - more than enough to qualify for a page. The other four spears have none of this. We shouldn't be making decisions like this based on an all-or-nothing school of thought. If you think it would be too "weird" to have only two weapons for the Toa Hagah in Template:ToolsNav, we could easily keep the names in the navbox, and just set them up to link to their respective Toa pages' Mask and Tools sections.
::I would also oppose making a page for all 6 weapons (for one, what would we even call the page?). [[Rahaga Staffs]] works because each of the weapons has an individual power, but not enough specific information to qualify for a page. The Avalanche Spear, etc. have nothing but their names. There just isn't enough info to justify listing these 4 anywhere but their respective Toa pages. --[[User:Angel Bob|Angel Bob]] ([[User talk:Angel Bob|talk]]) 22:51, 17 April 2017 (CET)
:::I think the information we have on the two spears is short enough that we could put it on the toa pages - set information, for one thing, isn't really independent, since they only came as part of the toa sets. [[User:Intelligence4|Intelligence4]] ([[User talk:Intelligence4|talk]]) 19:43, 26 April 2017 (CET)
::::Or we could create a page that just covers all six spears-don't a couple of the G2 weapons have something like that going?--[[User:Wiriamu|Wiriamu]] ([[User talk:Wiriamu|talk]]) 21:11, 30 May 2017 (CET)
I already suggested this and it does look like a good idea, I added it as a third option. '''[[User:OnionShark|<font color="black">~</font><font color="castletongreen">OnionShark</font>]]''' 07:43, 31 May 2017 (CET)
:I still think that we should merge the page with their respective toa pages, since we have a section on each of those pages for the toa's tools anyway, but you can count my vote for just merging the pages into one if we need to push it over the limit to get it done. [[User:Intelligence4|Intelligence4]] ([[User talk:Intelligence4|talk]]) 23:07, 2 June 2017 (CET)
::I think it is definitely a good idea to merge these pages into one, and to possibly do something similar for a number of other pages as well.--[[User:HarsulinsGhost|Harsulin&#39;s Ghost]] ([[User talk:HarsulinsGhost|talk]]) 01:09, 22 June 2017 (CET)
:::[[BIONICLEsector01:Sandbox#Toa_Hagah_Spears|Sandbox page made.]] What do you guys think? --<font color="PaleTurquoise" Style="background:Black">[[User:Master Inika|<font color="PaleTurquoise">Master Inika]]</font><small><sup>  ([[User talk:Master Inika|<font color="PaleTurquoise">Talk</font>]]) </sup></small></font>  06:21, 29 June 2017 (CET)
:::: We should do that with so many weapons (Vahki staffs, Bohrok/Bohrok-Kal shields, Rahkshi Staffs) too, and the sandbox's looking pretty good. — '''[[User:Surel-nuva|<font color="DARKBLUE">Surel</font><font color="DARKRED">—</font><font color="GOLDENROD">Nuva</font>]] <small>([[User talk:Surel-nuva|<font color="#8A7F8D">''Talk''</font>]])</small>''' 16:55, 29 June 2017 (CET)
:::::I agree; that looks good for a release candidate page and we should totally do that with a bunch of other clone-style weapons. I think we should make a list on which page groups to do that to as a separate topic on here to vote on. (i guess i'll get to that in a sec.) as far as the actual sandbox goes, i think we could publish it as is, but there are a few edits i can think of making right off the bat, including changing the infobox image - as is, the cropped image looks like norik's tool belongs to iruni. [[User:Intelligence4|Intelligence4]] ([[User talk:Intelligence4|talk]]) 01:35, 30 June 2017 (CET)
Another thing, since there's 8 votes for this now, can anyone close the voting and declare it decided, or is that a staff thing? [[User:Intelligence4|Intelligence4]] ([[User talk:Intelligence4|talk]]) 01:36, 30 June 2017 (CET)
:Yep, done. I don't want to delete the pages until we've finalized the new page though. Specifically I think we should come up with a better way of incorporating the trivia points about Norik's and Iruini's tools into the rest of the article. If there isn't a good way to do this, I suggest reconsidering the merge as it shouldn't come at the cost of making content harder to find. -- '''[[User:Morris the Mata Nui Cow|<font color="#f11f1f">Morris the Mata Nui Cow</font>]]''' ([[User talk:Morris the Mata Nui Cow|talk]]) 01:45, 30 June 2017 (CET)
::I think I just solved the problem Morris, didn't I? — '''[[User:Surel-nuva|<font color="DARKBLUE">Surel</font><font color="DARKRED">—</font><font color="GOLDENROD">Nuva</font>]] <small>([[User talk:Surel-nuva|<font color="#8A7F8D">''Talk''</font>]])</small>''' 12:42, 30 June 2017 (CET)
Can I make the page? The six individual page will be 6 redirects, we should not delete them. — '''[[User:Surel-nuva|<font color="DARKBLUE">Surel</font><font color="DARKRED">—</font><font color="GOLDENROD">Nuva</font>]] <small>([[User talk:Surel-nuva|<font color="#8A7F8D">''Talk''</font>]])</small>''' 16:53, 30 June 2017 (CET)


==Clone Tools==
==Clone Tools==
For want of a better word, I'm making this section to nominate the deletion/merging of a bunch of pages, as mentioned in the toa hagah tools discussion. I figured instead of making a yes/no votes section, we could just have a running tally of each group of pages we want to condense. If you think of another set of pages you want to nominate, just add it as a subsection here and we can all vote.
For want of a better word, I'm making this section to nominate the deletion/merging of a bunch of pages, as mentioned in the toa hagah tools discussion. I figured instead of making a yes/no votes section, we could just have a running tally of each group of pages we want to condense. If you think of another set of pages you want to nominate, just add it as a subsection here and we can all vote.
===Stun Staffs===
# [[User:Intelligence4|Intelligence4]] ([[User talk:Intelligence4|talk]]) 01:41, 30 June 2017 (CET)
#— '''[[User:Surel-nuva|<font color="DARKBLUE">Surel</font><font color="DARKRED">—</font><font color="GOLDENROD">Nuva</font>]] <small>([[User talk:Surel-nuva|<font color="#8A7F8D">''Talk''</font>]])</small>''' 14:16, 30 June 2017 (CET)
# '''[[User:OnionShark|<font color="black">~</font><font color="castletongreen">OnionShark</font>]]''' 15:44, 30 June 2017 (CET)
=== Don't Make Stun Staffs ===


===Rahkshi Staffs===
===Rahkshi Staffs===
====Make Rahkshi Staffs====
#[[User:Intelligence4|Intelligence4]] ([[User talk:Intelligence4|talk]]) 01:44, 30 June 2017 (CET)
#[[User:Intelligence4|Intelligence4]] ([[User talk:Intelligence4|talk]]) 01:44, 30 June 2017 (CET)
#— '''[[User:Surel-nuva|<font color="DARKBLUE">Surel</font><font color="DARKRED">—</font><font color="GOLDENROD">Nuva</font>]] <small>([[User talk:Surel-nuva|<font color="#8A7F8D">''Talk''</font>]])</small>''' 14:16, 30 June 2017 (CET)
#— '''[[User:Surel-nuva|<font color="DARKBLUE">Surel</font><font color="DARKRED">—</font><font color="GOLDENROD">Nuva</font>]] <small>([[User talk:Surel-nuva|<font color="#8A7F8D">''Talk''</font>]])</small>''' 14:16, 30 June 2017 (CET)
# '''[[User:OnionShark|<font color="black">~</font><font color="castletongreen">OnionShark</font>]]''' 15:44, 30 June 2017 (CET)
# --[[User:777stairs|777stairs]] ([[User talk:777stairs|talk]]) 18:49, 3 July 2017 (CET)
=== Don't Make Rahkshi Staffs ===
#No these tools don't contain a Rahkshi's power, but they still are a very notable weapon deserving a page.--[[User:HarsulinsGhost|Harsulin&#39;s Ghost]] ([[User talk:HarsulinsGhost|talk]]) 02:17, 19 July 2017 (CET)
 
====Don't make Rahkshi Staffs====
# Nah, it's an extension of their own power, not a separate tool. --<span class="plainlinks">[http://biosector01.com/wiki/index.php/User:Swert <img>http://biosector01.com/swert/WikiSig.png</img>]</span> <sup><font color="#09c2e3">Owner ([[User talk:Swert|<font color="#09c2e3">talk</font>]]|[[Special:Contributions/Swert|<font color="#09c2e3">contribs</font>]])</font></sup> 05:20, 1 July 2017 (CET)
====Delete the pages but don't make Rahkshi Staffs====
# I agree with Swert that we don't need a page including all the staffs, but this also implies that we don't need pages for them at all. '''[[User:OnionShark|<font color="black">~</font><font color="castletongreen">OnionShark</font>]]''' 12:25, 1 July 2017 (CET)
# --[[User:WOLKsite|WOLKsite]] ([[User talk:WOLKsite|talk]]) 16:31, 10 July 2017 (CET)


===Bohrok Shields===
===Bohrok Shields===
====Make Bohrok Shields====
#— '''[[User:Surel-nuva|<font color="DARKBLUE">Surel</font><font color="DARKRED">—</font><font color="GOLDENROD">Nuva</font>]] <small>([[User talk:Surel-nuva|<font color="#8A7F8D">''Talk''</font>]])</small>''' 14:16, 30 June 2017 (CET)
#— '''[[User:Surel-nuva|<font color="DARKBLUE">Surel</font><font color="DARKRED">—</font><font color="GOLDENROD">Nuva</font>]] <small>([[User talk:Surel-nuva|<font color="#8A7F8D">''Talk''</font>]])</small>''' 14:16, 30 June 2017 (CET)
# '''[[User:OnionShark|<font color="black">~</font><font color="castletongreen">OnionShark</font>]]''' 15:44, 30 June 2017 (CET)
# '''[[User:OnionShark|<font color="black">~</font><font color="castletongreen">OnionShark</font>]]''' 15:44, 30 June 2017 (CET)
===Don't Make Bohrok Shields ===
# --[[User:777stairs|777stairs]] ([[User talk:777stairs|talk]]) 18:49, 3 July 2017 (CET)
# --[[User:WOLKsite|WOLKsite]] ([[User talk:WOLKsite|talk]]) 16:39, 10 July 2017 (CET)
#--[[User:HarsulinsGhost|Harsulin&#39;s Ghost]] ([[User talk:HarsulinsGhost|talk]]) 17:54, 12 July 2017 (CET)
 
====Don't make Bohrok Shields====
# if the rakhshi staffs are an extension of their power, then the bohrok shields certainly are as well. for one thing, the staffs were something that they held in their hands and could be put down, but i don't think we've ever seen a bohrok put its shields down. afaiknew, they were part of the bohrok themselves, and not a separate tool. anyway, i don't think we need a page for these, we can just have a section on the [[bohrok]] article for them.


===Bohrok-Kal Shields===
===Bohrok-Kal Shields===
#maybe it could be merged with the Bohrok shields— '''[[User:Surel-nuva|<font color="DARKBLUE">Surel</font><font color="DARKRED">—</font><font color="GOLDENROD">Nuva</font>]] <small>([[User talk:Surel-nuva|<font color="#8A7F8D">''Talk''</font>]])</small>'''
====Make Bohrok-Kal Shields====
# '''[[User:Surel-nuva|<font color="DARKBLUE">Surel</font><font color="DARKRED">—</font><font color="GOLDENROD">Nuva</font>]] <small>([[User talk:Surel-nuva|<font color="#8A7F8D">''Talk''</font>]])</small>'''
# '''[[User:OnionShark|<font color="black">~</font><font color="castletongreen">OnionShark</font>]]''' 15:44, 30 June 2017 (CET)
# '''[[User:OnionShark|<font color="black">~</font><font color="castletongreen">OnionShark</font>]]''' 15:44, 30 June 2017 (CET)
=== Don't Make Bohrok-Kal Shields ===
#I'm for putting them on their own page, sure. --<span class="plainlinks">[http://biosector01.com/wiki/index.php/User:Swert <img>http://biosector01.com/swert/WikiSig.png</img>]</span> <sup><font color="#09c2e3">Owner ([[User talk:Swert|<font color="#09c2e3">talk</font>]]|[[Special:Contributions/Swert|<font color="#09c2e3">contribs</font>]])</font></sup> 05:20, 1 July 2017 (CET)
# --[[User:777stairs|777stairs]] ([[User talk:777stairs|talk]]) 18:49, 3 July 2017 (CET)
#These shields seem iconic enough to be separate from the normal Borohk shields.--[[User:HarsulinsGhost|Harsulin&#39;s Ghost]] ([[User talk:HarsulinsGhost|talk]]) 17:50, 12 July 2017 (CET)


===Bohrok Va Tools===
====Don't make Bohrok-Kal Shields====
#— '''[[User:Surel-nuva|<font color="DARKBLUE">Surel</font><font color="DARKRED">—</font><font color="GOLDENROD">Nuva</font>]] <small>([[User talk:Surel-nuva|<font color="#8A7F8D">''Talk''</font>]])</small>''' 14:16, 30 June 2017 (CET)
# I feel it would belong on the same page as the regular Bohrok Shields. --[[User:WOLKsite|WOLKsite]] ([[User talk:WOLKsite|talk]]) 16:39, 10 July 2017 (CET)
=== Don't Make Bohrok Va Tools ===
# same argument as the bohrok shields above from me - and if we were to create that page, i don't think the kal shields are special enough to warrant their own page - perhaps a section of the regular bohrok shields page, if anything. ideally, there would just be a section for them on the bohrok kal page. [[User:Intelligence4|Intelligence4]] ([[User talk:Intelligence4|talk]]) 20:23, 15 July 2017 (CET)
# See the comments '''[[User:OnionShark|<font color="black">~</font><font color="castletongreen">OnionShark</font>]]''' 15:44, 30 June 2017 (CET)


=== Merge [[Twin Knives]] with Takadox ===
===[[Twin Knives]]===
====Merge [[Twin Knives]] with Takadox====
# See the comments '''[[User:OnionShark|<font color="black">~</font><font color="castletongreen">OnionShark</font>]]''' 15:44, 30 June 2017 (CET)
# See the comments '''[[User:OnionShark|<font color="black">~</font><font color="castletongreen">OnionShark</font>]]''' 15:44, 30 June 2017 (CET)
# we could probably do this with a lot of pages - most tools didn't show up separately from their users. [[User:Intelligence4|Intelligence4]] ([[User talk:Intelligence4|talk]]) 01:31, 1 July 2017 (CET)
# we could probably do this with a lot of pages - most tools didn't show up separately from their users. [[User:Intelligence4|Intelligence4]] ([[User talk:Intelligence4|talk]]) 01:31, 1 July 2017 (CET)
====Don't merge Twin Knives with Takadox====
# I'm not convinced that this doesn't warrant the same treatment as the other Barraki pages. --[[User:777stairs|777stairs]] ([[User talk:777stairs|talk]]) 18:49, 3 July 2017 (CET)
# Individual enough to be on its on page. We have the same ammount of info about it as we have about the [[Flame Claws]] — '''[[User:Surel-nuva|<font color="DARKBLUE">Surel</font><font color="DARKRED">—</font><font color="GOLDENROD">Nuva</font>]] <small>([[User talk:Surel-nuva|<font color="#8A7F8D">''Talk''</font>]])</small>''' 12:04, 8 July 2017 (CET)
# --[[User:WOLKsite|WOLKsite]] ([[User talk:WOLKsite|talk]]) 16:39, 10 July 2017 (CET)


=== Don't Merge Twin Knives with Takadox ===
===Comments===
 
The Piraka weapons are individuals enough to deserve their own pages. — '''[[User:Surel-nuva|<font color="DARKBLUE">Surel</font><font color="DARKRED">—</font><font color="GOLDENROD">Nuva</font>]] <small>([[User talk:Surel-nuva|<font color="#8A7F8D">''Talk''</font>]])</small>''' 14:16, 30 June 2017 (CET)
===Comments on them===
The Piraka weapons are individuals enough to deserve their own pages. The Barraki's tools are questionable. — '''[[User:Surel-nuva|<font color="DARKBLUE">Surel</font><font color="DARKRED">—</font><font color="GOLDENROD">Nuva</font>]] <small>([[User talk:Surel-nuva|<font color="#8A7F8D">''Talk''</font>]])</small>''' 14:16, 30 June 2017 (CET)


:The Shark Tooth Blades and Tri-talons have enough info on them to merit pages of their own, but I think that one for the Twin Knives is unneeded. I also like the suggestion of having both the normal and Kal shields on the same page, but for now let's keep the voting options apart. Lastly, I don't think that a page for the Va's tools is needed, simply because they don't already have pages of their own but are mentioned in the abilities and traits sections of their respective Bohrok, so they are fine like this. '''[[User:OnionShark|<font color="black">~</font><font color="castletongreen">OnionShark</font>]]''' 15:44, 30 June 2017 (CET)
:The Shark Tooth Blades and Tri-talons have enough info on them to merit pages of their own, but I think that one for the Twin Knives is unneeded. I also like the suggestion of having both the normal and Kal shields on the same page, but for now let's keep the voting options apart. Lastly, I don't think that a page for the Va's tools is needed, simply because they don't already have pages of their own but are mentioned in the abilities and traits sections of their respective Bohrok, so they are fine like this. '''[[User:OnionShark|<font color="black">~</font><font color="castletongreen">OnionShark</font>]]''' 15:44, 30 June 2017 (CET)
Line 95: Line 57:


:::One more reason to get rid of the 7 Rahkshi staffs that answer claims that the shape of the staff doesn't matter, they are just the focus.{{GregCitation|OGD|May 19 2003, 11:29 AM}} So Guurahk's and the Rahkshi of Heat Vision's staff are the same weapon, but being held by another Rahkshi. — '''[[User:Surel-nuva|<font color="DARKBLUE">Surel</font><font color="DARKRED">—</font><font color="GOLDENROD">Nuva</font>]] <small>([[User talk:Surel-nuva|<font color="#8A7F8D">''Talk''</font>]])</small>''' 17:44, 30 June 2017 (CET)
:::One more reason to get rid of the 7 Rahkshi staffs that answer claims that the shape of the staff doesn't matter, they are just the focus.{{GregCitation|OGD|May 19 2003, 11:29 AM}} So Guurahk's and the Rahkshi of Heat Vision's staff are the same weapon, but being held by another Rahkshi. — '''[[User:Surel-nuva|<font color="DARKBLUE">Surel</font><font color="DARKRED">—</font><font color="GOLDENROD">Nuva</font>]] <small>([[User talk:Surel-nuva|<font color="#8A7F8D">''Talk''</font>]])</small>''' 17:44, 30 June 2017 (CET)
::::It seems like batching clone weapons on a single page would be better organization, but will character pages have any info for tools or will all the info be on the list of clone weapons? Also, in the case of say, Takadox's Twin Knives, where his weapon would be merged with his character page, does anybody think it excessive to have a page batching the Barraki tools together even though they are not clone tools?--[[User:HarsulinsGhost|Harsulin&#39;s Ghost]] ([[User talk:HarsulinsGhost|talk]]) 02:01, 1 July 2017 (CET)
Eh I think we should only be doing this sort of thing for clone weapons. -- '''[[User:Morris the Mata Nui Cow|<font color="#f11f1f">Morris the Mata Nui Cow</font>]]''' ([[User talk:Morris the Mata Nui Cow|talk]]) 05:28, 1 July 2017 (CET)
:Do we have any other clone tools? — '''[[User:Surel-nuva|<font color="DARKBLUE">Surel</font><font color="DARKRED">—</font><font color="GOLDENROD">Nuva</font>]] <small>([[User talk:Surel-nuva|<font color="#8A7F8D">''Talk''</font>]])</small>''' 12:10, 8 July 2017 (CET)
::Bohrok Va still need to be voted on. I'll make the section.--[[User:HarsulinsGhost|Harsulin&#39;s Ghost]] ([[User talk:HarsulinsGhost|talk]]) 18:19, 12 July 2017 (CET)
:::Oops. Didn't realize it was already decided. And no, I suppose they don't have staffs, I guess I was just thinking about Tahnok Va when I did that.--[[User:HarsulinsGhost|Harsulin&#39;s Ghost]] ([[User talk:HarsulinsGhost|talk]]) 20:44, 12 July 2017 (CET)

Revision as of 11:47, 27 July 2017


Clone Tools

For want of a better word, I'm making this section to nominate the deletion/merging of a bunch of pages, as mentioned in the toa hagah tools discussion. I figured instead of making a yes/no votes section, we could just have a running tally of each group of pages we want to condense. If you think of another set of pages you want to nominate, just add it as a subsection here and we can all vote.

Rahkshi Staffs

Make Rahkshi Staffs

  1. Intelligence4 (talk) 01:44, 30 June 2017 (CET)
  2. SurelNuva (Talk) 14:16, 30 June 2017 (CET)
  3. --777stairs (talk) 18:49, 3 July 2017 (CET)
  4. No these tools don't contain a Rahkshi's power, but they still are a very notable weapon deserving a page.--Harsulin's Ghost (talk) 02:17, 19 July 2017 (CET)

Don't make Rahkshi Staffs

  1. Nah, it's an extension of their own power, not a separate tool. --External Image Owner (talk|contribs) 05:20, 1 July 2017 (CET)

Delete the pages but don't make Rahkshi Staffs

  1. I agree with Swert that we don't need a page including all the staffs, but this also implies that we don't need pages for them at all. ~OnionShark 12:25, 1 July 2017 (CET)
  2. --WOLKsite (talk) 16:31, 10 July 2017 (CET)

Bohrok Shields

Make Bohrok Shields

  1. SurelNuva (Talk) 14:16, 30 June 2017 (CET)
  2. ~OnionShark 15:44, 30 June 2017 (CET)
  3. --777stairs (talk) 18:49, 3 July 2017 (CET)
  4. --WOLKsite (talk) 16:39, 10 July 2017 (CET)
  5. --Harsulin's Ghost (talk) 17:54, 12 July 2017 (CET)

Don't make Bohrok Shields

  1. if the rakhshi staffs are an extension of their power, then the bohrok shields certainly are as well. for one thing, the staffs were something that they held in their hands and could be put down, but i don't think we've ever seen a bohrok put its shields down. afaiknew, they were part of the bohrok themselves, and not a separate tool. anyway, i don't think we need a page for these, we can just have a section on the bohrok article for them.

Bohrok-Kal Shields

Make Bohrok-Kal Shields

  1. SurelNuva (Talk)
  2. ~OnionShark 15:44, 30 June 2017 (CET)
  3. I'm for putting them on their own page, sure. --External Image Owner (talk|contribs) 05:20, 1 July 2017 (CET)
  4. --777stairs (talk) 18:49, 3 July 2017 (CET)
  5. These shields seem iconic enough to be separate from the normal Borohk shields.--Harsulin's Ghost (talk) 17:50, 12 July 2017 (CET)

Don't make Bohrok-Kal Shields

  1. I feel it would belong on the same page as the regular Bohrok Shields. --WOLKsite (talk) 16:39, 10 July 2017 (CET)
  2. same argument as the bohrok shields above from me - and if we were to create that page, i don't think the kal shields are special enough to warrant their own page - perhaps a section of the regular bohrok shields page, if anything. ideally, there would just be a section for them on the bohrok kal page. Intelligence4 (talk) 20:23, 15 July 2017 (CET)

Twin Knives

Merge Twin Knives with Takadox

  1. See the comments ~OnionShark 15:44, 30 June 2017 (CET)
  2. we could probably do this with a lot of pages - most tools didn't show up separately from their users. Intelligence4 (talk) 01:31, 1 July 2017 (CET)

Don't merge Twin Knives with Takadox

  1. I'm not convinced that this doesn't warrant the same treatment as the other Barraki pages. --777stairs (talk) 18:49, 3 July 2017 (CET)
  2. Individual enough to be on its on page. We have the same ammount of info about it as we have about the Flame ClawsSurelNuva (Talk) 12:04, 8 July 2017 (CET)
  3. --WOLKsite (talk) 16:39, 10 July 2017 (CET)

Comments

The Piraka weapons are individuals enough to deserve their own pages. — SurelNuva (Talk) 14:16, 30 June 2017 (CET)

The Shark Tooth Blades and Tri-talons have enough info on them to merit pages of their own, but I think that one for the Twin Knives is unneeded. I also like the suggestion of having both the normal and Kal shields on the same page, but for now let's keep the voting options apart. Lastly, I don't think that a page for the Va's tools is needed, simply because they don't already have pages of their own but are mentioned in the abilities and traits sections of their respective Bohrok, so they are fine like this. ~OnionShark 15:44, 30 June 2017 (CET)
Pahrak Va have the same hammers as Turaga Onewa, the Tahnok Va have firestaffs like Turaga Vakama. — SurelNuva (Talk) 15:49, 30 June 2017 (CET)
One more reason to get rid of the 7 Rahkshi staffs that answer claims that the shape of the staff doesn't matter, they are just the focus.[1] So Guurahk's and the Rahkshi of Heat Vision's staff are the same weapon, but being held by another Rahkshi. — SurelNuva (Talk) 17:44, 30 June 2017 (CET)
It seems like batching clone weapons on a single page would be better organization, but will character pages have any info for tools or will all the info be on the list of clone weapons? Also, in the case of say, Takadox's Twin Knives, where his weapon would be merged with his character page, does anybody think it excessive to have a page batching the Barraki tools together even though they are not clone tools?--Harsulin's Ghost (talk) 02:01, 1 July 2017 (CET)

Eh I think we should only be doing this sort of thing for clone weapons. -- Morris the Mata Nui Cow (talk) 05:28, 1 July 2017 (CET)

Do we have any other clone tools? — SurelNuva (Talk) 12:10, 8 July 2017 (CET)
Bohrok Va still need to be voted on. I'll make the section.--Harsulin's Ghost (talk) 18:19, 12 July 2017 (CET)
Oops. Didn't realize it was already decided. And no, I suppose they don't have staffs, I guess I was just thinking about Tahnok Va when I did that.--Harsulin's Ghost (talk) 20:44, 12 July 2017 (CET)
  1. "Official Greg Discussion", post {{{post}}}. BZPower Forums. (archived on greg.thegreatarchives.com)