User talk:Dorek

From BIONICLEsector01

Archive
2008
September
October
November
December
2009
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
2010
January
February

Contents 1 my account 2 GrammarHammer 3 alt. teridax 4 Bull pic 5 Question 6 Notice 7 Journey's End 3 8 Spherus Magna 9 Epic 10 UP 11 Malackarditus 12 Retcon

my account

i just had some evidence someone hacked it, can you check if i got on at a different ip? oh, can you also delete User:Oratam/mock-ups‎? talk 22:10, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

GrammarHammer

I don't know what that was about, but I am allowed to. Says so on the Awards/Achievements Policy page, the Grammar Hammer section. It says "Talk pages are also counted", implying I can, in fact, edit other member's comments. Also, I never stated 'This bugs me so much I'm going to correct it', I just corrected it. Toa Nidhiki05: Toa of Air ^{Talk | Contributions | Userbox Library}

And you're one of the people that's ridiculously obnoxious when doing so. --~|RC|~ ^(Talk/_Contribs) 01:52, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

No, I'm not. I am not obnoxious. Toa Nidhiki05: Toa of Air ^{Talk | Contributions | Userbox Library}

I'd also like to point out that the policy states BIONICLE pages only.

And believe me, saying "grammer hammer" in all caps is obnoxious. --~|RC|~ ^(Talk/_Contribs) 01:55, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

To you, maybe, but not to me and my friend. --Bold Clone _(Sandbox\^Contribs) 01:59, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Talk pages are not allowed, the page says "talk-pages are also counted" as things that do not get you an achievement. Cut it out. `Kraahlix

Right, because you're not the person who's having your simple spelling mistakes paraded around constantly. To my friend and I (ha, I can do it too), it is. As simple as something like this may be, to compound it as has been done here (that is, the frequency of "grammer hammers" seen in edit comments and the joy people attain from it) actually hurts those little, tiny things I like to call... Personal feelings. That is no matter of interpretation. That is how it is. --~|RC|~ ^(Talk/_Contribs) 02:07, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

...So capitals and the frequency of the term 'grammar hammar' hurts your feelings? --Bold Clone _(Sandbox\^Contribs) 02:10, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Consistently and constantly being told of your mistakes wouldn't effect yours? --~|RC|~ ^(Talk/_Contribs) 02:12, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

It might...but if they were fixing my poor-quality work for me, then I would actually appreciate the help. :) --Bold Clone _(Sandbox\^Contribs) 02:15, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Good thing we are not questioning Triggy's work ethic then, as he made a simple typo. I believe you are done here. `Kraahlix

Yes, you guys fix mistakes that we make. THAT'S HOW A WIKI WORKS. That's the POINT of this place. We don't need to be constantly and rudely reminded of something you guys should just do naturally, and then be expected to reward you for it. --Dorek (Talk| Contribs) 02:22, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

In that case, I propose to the Staffers that they completely do away with the Grammar Hammar achivement, instead of critizing regular member for following the rules. No offense meant, but I don't know why this wasn't thought of before. :) --Bold Clone _(Sandbox\^Contribs) 02:25, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

I've been saying that since it's inception, and it's why I don't give the achievement.

And it's not in the rules to be rude and annoying while doing it, which is where the original problem was. --Dorek (Talk| Contribs) 02:27, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Also...

1. Are we supposed to believe you are smiling at us?
2. Yeah, many of the staff dislike GH (not to be confused with Guitar Hero)
3. But no, there was no following the rules here. As has been stated, the policy was poorly worded. `Kraahlix

The key words there are "rude and annoying", which are subjective and vary from person to person. That's what started this entire thing in the first place. --Bold Clone _(Sandbox\^Contribs) 02:29, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

1. The smile doesn't mean I'm smug, it's supposed to mean 'no offense meant'; My bad.
2. Why haven't you done something about it?
3. Then TN5 doesn't get another spellpoint. 'Nuff said.

--Bold Clone _(Sandbox\^Contribs) 02:34, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

They seem to be fairly well defined amongst the staff; again, the ones you're trying to get them from, and I know I've brought up issues like this before. --Dorek (Talk| Contribs) 02:36, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

When word it like what ET said, that makes sense. I'm sorry if I or any other collector of GHs hurt your feelings; however, if you hate the achievement, get rid of it. Sorry for my misunderstandingToa Nidhiki05: Toa of Air ^{Talk | Contributions | Userbox Library}

Yeah, even though I have almost a complete grammar hammer, I don't really care about it. Feel free to get rid of it.--`Vartemp ^{(Talk | Contribs)}

*puts hands up* I fully support the removal of this achievement! :D KANOHIJOURNAL ^{(Bioran · Talk)}

Start sandboxing some 2nd gen achievements or a worthwhile replacement for it. `Kraahlix

alt. teridax

i don't know if you got the original message, but Equinox's entry has a kanoka launcher as well as the hammer. thx, (talk|services)

Bull pic

Wow. I can't believe it. You, Triggy, and Dorek all tried to upload my image at the exact same time. I've seen some pretty weird things on here, but really you all uploaded within one minute of each other. Did you guys plan that or something like "Okay, at 22:04, we're all gonna freak Duran out by uploading at the exact same time" ??? Anyway, for your very very good timing, I give you this.

=Toa Duran= 22:53, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Question

Am I allowed to nominate something for deletion?-- 03:21, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Sure? Why not? I mean, there are certain things that don't necessarily have grounds to be deleted but as a general rule, you can nominate anything you want for deletion. --Dorek (Talk| Contribs) 03:23, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

ok thank you for the clarification. also how does someone obtain the O:RAC award for helping or that one for fixing spelling?-- 03:43, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Usually (note the word usually) you'd ask whoever you correct. However, as I do not believe in the system, I personally don't give them out. --Dorek (Talk| Contribs) 03:55, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

ok thank you fr helping me understand :)-- 04:04, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

I just nominated the brakas for deletion-- 04:17, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Notice

My friend dorek i saw a creation from biokirby on the alternate teridax contest and his creation has a claw which i believe is not allowed and legofan6113 also has a type of shield/claw weapon as well. I just wanted to tell you about this --_Talk 18:52, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Journey's End 3

So since you're both good at it and seem to enjoy it, wanna work on fixing the JE additions added to the character articles? They could use some work. --~|RC|~ ^(Talk/_Contribs) 21:49, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Spherus Magna

Wel, I posted saying the template was screwed up, and ET fixed it saying that I should've done it myself, but I can't edit it, so I put that there because the edit block is gone from ET's talk. When I go there, I can't edit it. Lord Nektann

Epic

What?! We've got that word on the main sentence here. :P -Grant-Sud-^{(Mail/Contributions)} 23:44, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Not no mo we don't >=( --Dorek (Talk| Contribs) 23:52, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Sorry about that. Will keep a patrol out for that banned word. :) -Grant-Sud-^{(Mail/Contributions)} 23:55, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Maybe I'll add it to maintenence if I ever get not lazy. --Dorek (Talk| Contribs) 23:56, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

wow. first sentance. No idea what to do with it. JMSOG, Not JSMOG ^Dictionary_Talk

UP

YESSS!!! Awwwwwwwyeah!! :D Never noticed your Userpage before. But don't get rid of it. Me likey. -Grant-Sud-^{(Mail/Contributions)} 00:36, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Teehee. Yeah, I like it. Gotta love the rich little guy. --Dorek (Talk| Contribs) 00:39, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

I bet he looks (or at least acts) like you :'D^{(Contributions/Sandbox/Talk)}

Can't help but adore the spoiled little rich kid who's door bell rings, 'monnneeeeeyyy'. X) Anyway, again that's pretty awesome. -Grant-Sud-^{(Mail/Contributions)} 00:47, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Malackarditus

Yeah, but they huv things in their shoulderz, like in their shoulders kk?? >:C^{(Contributions/Sandbox/Talk)}

*Dorek chops DL in half*

>_> Well, I mean that Malum and Ackar have shoulder armor, and this guy doesn't. But I see that in Ellis' Illustrations (:D) he doesn't draw them. The helmet is the same. Nevermind.^{(Contributions/Sandbox/Talk)}

Perdilumar says: Compare to chapter three. --Dorek (Talk| Contribs) 03:40, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Retcon

Actually, that was the proper use, or at least a proper use. "Retcon" stands for "Retroactive Continuity", and there are many types of retcon. See here.--|Talk|Contributions 13:37, 11 March 2010 (UTC)