Talk:Radiak
From BIONICLEsector01, working on 1,551 articles.
That doesn't look like an Matoran at all. XD -- The 1 and Only, Katani the joker (A page of Blah/My little edit thingy.). 00:32, 1 December 2007 (PST)
- Yet it is. It's one of the "evil" ones, I assume. --
Owner (User Page / Talk / BS01) 00:33, 1 December 2007 (PST)
Are we sure about that radiation thing? ~ BufFooN ---Talk
Contents |
Templates
(Just chose a random one here) Okay, the Shadow Matoran pages are becoming way too template heavy. We need to decide now if we just keep them on the Av-Matoran template or just use the Shadow Matoran one. Or, take them off of the BoM one. --~|ET|~ (Talk/Contribs) 03:22, 11 December 2007 (PST)
I'd say take them off the Av-matoran page. Since Vican was never an Av-matoran and the other three are no longer Av-matoran it just seems better to leave them as shadow matoran, and since they are currently with the Makuta they should remain there too.Jts21 15:53, 12 December 2007 (PST)
Sloth
The description on this page seems to have Sloth (the animal) mixed up with Sloth (the sin). Just thought I'd bring that up, since GregF meant the second while whoever wrote the discription here changed it around a bit mistaking what Greg meant with Sloth (the animal), no worries though, I fixed it up. Jts21 15:49, 12 December 2007 (PST)
- You are sure of this how? What I had written up was fine, though. I said "sloth-like," as in they are like sloths (the animal) because they are slow. --~|ET|~ (Talk/Contribs) 16:26, 12 December 2007 (PST)
- Well by definition sloth means spiritual and/or actual apathy or laziness, which is exactly what that power is. It is the bionicle universe after all so why name a power after an animal that doesn't exist there versus using the word which means the same as the summary of his power. After all Greg wrote Sloth then defined what he meant by sloth by putting a couple -- and the definition of his power. I mean since the animals were named after how they acted saying somthing is sloth-like is less precise. His power is called sloth, so he never once says its the animal. Basicly I'm sure of this since it makes alot more sense than naming the power after an animal that has the traits of the original word. Another thing to consider is this; these are evil shadow beings is it more within their character to name their powers after sins or fuzzy animals? I hope i'm not sounding rude or anything I'm just laying down the facts from my point of veiw and trying to make it so you can see from my point of veiw. Jts21 18:26, 12 December 2007 (PST)
- Sin is associated with religion, which LEGO wishes to keep out of its product lines. So for Greg to name the power after something like that would make no sense. Regardless, what it was named after has no affect on the power's description. It does what it does, no matter what you call it. -- Cheers, Gravitan(Talk | Contribs)
- I got it confirmed with GregF he did mean sloth as the word meaning aversion to work or exertion; laziness; indolence, not the animal. Also remember that just because sloth is a sin doesn't mean that the word itself is exclusive to the religion, it describes an action. Here's the link to his reply I posted in the Official Greg Discussion, I hope this clears things up.Jts21 17:09, 22 December 2007 (PST) http://www.bzpower.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=49257&st=11760&gopid=4985754&#entry4985754
Que?
I've seen this on the tops of Photok, Tanma, Radiak, Gavla, and Kirop. What is it? It kind of seems out of place. [[category:{{{element}}}]] (The preceding unsigned comment was made by Teebert)
- It's just some stupid mistake with the Matoran template. --~|ET|~ (Talk/Contribs) 13:43, 17 March 2008 (PDT)
