BIONICLEsector01 talk:Articles for Deletion

From BIONICLEsector01
Jump to: navigation, search

Shortcut: AFD

Conflict Between Ekimu and Makuta | 15:48, 27 January 2015 (CET)

It was hardly a conflict from what we know about it. Makuta's goal of the conflict wasn't even to defeat Ekimu; he was more preoccupied with using the MOUP than anything else. --Vartemp Talk 15:48, 27 January 2015 (CET)

Delete

  1. --Vartemp Talk 15:48, 27 January 2015 (CET)
  2. Yeah, after thinking it over for a few months, this definitely isn't necessary. --Angel Bob (talk) 23:39, 17 July 2015 (CEST)

Keep

  1. I recommend we keep it, but rename it Forging of the Mask of Ultimate Power and classify it as an event instead of a conflict.--Willess12 (talk) 17:59, 27 January 2015 (CET)
  2. --Gresh113, Glatorian of Air 18:16, 27 January 2015 (CET)
  3. ay--ToaJuaraevo01 (talk) 01:33, 26 February 2015 (CET)
  4. Per Willess12.--Kopaka Master of Ice (talk) 01:43, 26 February 2015 (CET)
  5. --Boidoh (talk) 13:57, 12 March 2015 (CET)

Rename

  1. Makuta's Betrayal? idunnolol -- Dorek Talk External Image 01:55, 26 February 2015 (CET)
  2. Moving vote from "keep". LockmanCapulet Crusty relics! 04:01, 12 March 2015 (CET)
  3. Especially now that we know it's officially called the Great Cataclysm (of Generation 2, of course). Toa Green Ninja - Bearer of the Mask of Spinjitzu (talk) 19:21, 27 July 2015 (CEST)

Comments

This keeps going back and forth. At this point, I don't even have an opinion anymore, so I'll let someone else handle this. --Angel Bob (talk) 16:55, 27 January 2015 (CET)

Willess actually has a really good idea. I say we make it an event, not a battle, whatever we call it. It is really significant after all. LockmanCapulet Crusty relics! 18:08, 27 January 2015 (CET)

I keep going over the videos for assorted reasons (make sure I have certain facts right, etc) and every time I watch The Legend, it's just the shortest thing ever and I wonder why people consider it a battle. The entirety of it is the one cool battle shot we have. It's significant, but it's hardly something that needs a page.
I could be amenable to changing it to an event, though... any good names for it? "Forging of the MOUP" is rather unwieldy. -- Dorek Talk External Image 19:23, 27 January 2015 (CET)
Since this hasn't been touched on in months, I'd be all for renaming it something like "Great Betrayal" or the like. It'll have a nickname template anyway. --Vartemp Talk 00:12, 24 July 2015 (CEST)

Well as GN mentioned the Bionicle website refers to the event as the "great cataclysm," but seeing as it's all lowercase it might be a quick nod to G1 rather than an official name. We could always move it to Great Cataclysm (Generation 2) and stick Template:Nickname on it per Var, but then if that turns out not to be the name, we'd have to re-rename both Great Cataclysm pages and fix all the links to them... wait for the book maybe? This seems like the kind of thing it'll touch on. -- Morris the Mata Nui Cow (talk) 04:28, 28 July 2015 (CEST)

While I originally meant my comment of "Makuta's Betrayal" as a joke, they also call it that a LOT (way more than great cataclysm) so my vote would change from being silly to serious, but the same thing. -- Dorek Talk External Image 04:48, 28 July 2015 (CEST)

2015 Character Animations

They're basically a subset of the 2015 Online Animations, so they should be folded in there somehow. My general thought was to split the info between the episode list and the page itself. Wouldn't be all that functionally different, and might make the appearances list a bit easier. -- Dorek Talk External Image 06:54, 6 August 2015 (CEST)

Merge with 2015 Online Animations

  1. -- Dorek Talk External Image 06:54, 6 August 2015 (CEST)
  2. --Vartemp Talk 17:48, 6 August 2015 (CEST)
  3. --Angel Bob (talk) 20:20, 6 August 2015 (CEST)
  4. --Don't the character anis use clips from the episodes anyway? LockmanCapulet Crusty relics! 18:25, 21 August 2015 (CEST)

Keep

Comments

So this is more or less what I was thinking; since these animations are all of the same origin, we do away with the distinction altogether and just lump them all under "animations". The risk is that if next year they continue doing animations, but in a completely different style, with a new company, and with new intent, basically. -- Dorek Talk External Image 19:33, 7 August 2015 (CEST)

Well, that doesn't look so bad. I'll change my vote. --Angel Bob (talk) 06:35, 8 August 2015 (CEST)