Template talk:MatoranNav
Hey, new info from Greg says Reysa is deceased. I want to update the navbox accordingly, but I'm not template-savvy and can't figure out how to do it. Anyone willing to come to my aid? --Angel Bob (talk) 00:10, 26 April 2014 (CEST)
- Also, that Mavrah is "revived", since he's still stuck in the red star. Intelligence4 (talk) 00:26, 26 April 2014 (CEST)
Velika
Should this template include something next to Velika's name about his true nature? Like "Disguised" or something? Master Inika (Talk) 03:40, 22 July 2014 (CEST)
- Eh... -- I AM THE DOREK do not truffle with me 03:42, 22 July 2014 (CEST)
Well... he is a Po-Matoran... He's a Great Being with the body of a Po-Matoran. ζox• Histories 
- I think, “disguised” or “disguised Great Being” is a good idea, because his mind isn't the mind of a Matoran. --Fippede 13:22, 22 July 2014 (CEST)
Bohrok?
All Bohrok, and Bohrok-kal by extension, were once Av-Matoran. Should Bohrok fall under "Transformed" Av-Matoran? -- Toa Jala Converse 06:23, 23 March 2016 (CET)
- No, because they're not individuals. However, the Kal are, so I think they should, personally. Would serve as a reminder that those were once individuals. However, I am not certain about if *every* Bohrok was once a Matoran. ~ Wolk (talk) 14:32, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Hi, just wanted to say that Iruini does not appear under the le-matoran category (The preceding unsigned comment was made by toahagahiruini)
Original Toa
Something that has bothered me with this list is that Helryx, Orde, and the Toa Mata get excluded since this is set up as being Matoran, and they weren't ever Matoran - However, we don't have a Toa template nor do I think they warrant one. I would like to somehow integrate them into this template... ~ Wolk (talk) 14:32, 18 May 2021 (UTC)