File talk:TLR Aqua Magna and Fragments.png

I'm trying to resolve the whole planet v.s. moon thing, on my own. Someone explain to me how exactly this is Aqua Magna? It is rough, like our moon... It seems to be pure rock and no trace of water, it is just, blue, thats the only thing going for it. --Boidoh (talk) 01:28, 4 October 2014 (CEST)

Exactly. It's blue. We've established that's often all that matters. The visual designers will present a shape, be told it needs to be colored blue (or green) to distinguish between the other moon/satellite/planetoid/whateverwhocares, and that's the end of it. That was made very clear in 2010 during the "Aqua Magna/Bota Magna" debate, the end result of which was "artistic license". -- I AM THE DOREK _{do not truffle with me} 02:33, 4 October 2014 (CEST)

But didn't we see in the same movie, a bit before that seen, the planet with liquid water? --Boidoh (talk) 02:36, 4 October 2014 (CEST)

More than any other year or subject, 2010's depictions of the two great fragments has a LOT of variation and a TON of it contradictory. That's why it had to be officially established (originally) that they were actually moons, not separate planets, and we had to generally accept that much of what we were given as "images" were of the "artistic license" kind. If you go to the Aqua Magna page, you'll see a lot of pictures that are distinctly round and planet like.

Maybe we're seeing the "backside" of the planet/moon where it is all broken from tearing away from SM. Just a thought with no basis for it XD ζox• ^Histories