Shortcut: AFD

BIONICLEsector01 talk:Articles for Deletion

From BIONICLEsector01
Revision as of 19:23, 15 July 2017 by Intelligence4 (talk | contribs) (Don't make Bohrok-Kal Shields)
Jump to: navigation, search

Clone Tools

For want of a better word, I'm making this section to nominate the deletion/merging of a bunch of pages, as mentioned in the toa hagah tools discussion. I figured instead of making a yes/no votes section, we could just have a running tally of each group of pages we want to condense. If you think of another set of pages you want to nominate, just add it as a subsection here and we can all vote.

Stun Staffs (Vahki weapons)

Make Stun Staffs

  1. Intelligence4 (talk) 01:41, 30 June 2017 (CET)
  2. SurelNuva (Talk) 14:16, 30 June 2017 (CET)
  3. ~OnionShark 15:44, 30 June 2017 (CET)
  4. Sure. --External Image Owner (talk|contribs) 05:21, 1 July 2017 (CET)
  5. --777stairs (talk) 18:49, 3 July 2017 (CET)
  6. --WOLKsite (talk) 16:39, 10 July 2017 (CET)

Don't make Stun Staffs

Rahkshi Staffs

Make Rahkshi Staffs

  1. Intelligence4 (talk) 01:44, 30 June 2017 (CET)
  2. SurelNuva (Talk) 14:16, 30 June 2017 (CET)
  3. --777stairs (talk) 18:49, 3 July 2017 (CET)

Don't make Rahkshi Staffs

  1. Nah, it's an extension of their own power, not a separate tool. --External Image Owner (talk|contribs) 05:20, 1 July 2017 (CET)

Delete the pages but don't make Rahkshi Staffs

  1. I agree with Swert that we don't need a page including all the staffs, but this also implies that we don't need pages for them at all. ~OnionShark 12:25, 1 July 2017 (CET)
  2. --WOLKsite (talk) 16:31, 10 July 2017 (CET)

Bohrok Shields

Make Bohrok Shields

  1. SurelNuva (Talk) 14:16, 30 June 2017 (CET)
  2. ~OnionShark 15:44, 30 June 2017 (CET)
  3. --777stairs (talk) 18:49, 3 July 2017 (CET)
  4. --WOLKsite (talk) 16:39, 10 July 2017 (CET)
  5. --Harsulin's Ghost (talk) 17:54, 12 July 2017 (CET)

Don't make Bohrok Shields

  1. if the rakhshi staffs are an extension of their power, then the bohrok shields certainly are as well. for one thing, the staffs were something that they held in their hands and could be put down, but i don't think we've ever seen a bohrok put its shields down. afaiknew, they were part of the bohrok themselves, and not a separate tool. anyway, i don't think we need a page for these, we can just have a section on the bohrok article for them.

Bohrok-Kal Shields

Make Bohrok-Kal Shields

  1. SurelNuva (Talk)
  2. ~OnionShark 15:44, 30 June 2017 (CET)
  3. I'm for putting them on their own page, sure. --External Image Owner (talk|contribs) 05:20, 1 July 2017 (CET)
  4. --777stairs (talk) 18:49, 3 July 2017 (CET)
  5. These shields seem iconic enough to be separate from the normal Borohk shields.--Harsulin's Ghost (talk) 17:50, 12 July 2017 (CET)

Don't make Bohrok-Kal Shields

  1. I feel it would belong on the same page as the regular Bohrok Shields. --WOLKsite (talk) 16:39, 10 July 2017 (CET)
  2. same argument as the bohrok shields above from me - and if we were to create that page, i don't think the kal shields are special enough to warrant their own page - perhaps a section of the regular bohrok shields page, if anything. ideally, there would just be a section for them on the bohrok kal page. Intelligence4 (talk) 20:23, 15 July 2017 (CET)

Twin Knives

Merge Twin Knives with Takadox

  1. See the comments ~OnionShark 15:44, 30 June 2017 (CET)
  2. we could probably do this with a lot of pages - most tools didn't show up separately from their users. Intelligence4 (talk) 01:31, 1 July 2017 (CET)

Don't merge Twin Knives with Takadox

  1. I'm not convinced that this doesn't warrant the same treatment as the other Barraki pages. --777stairs (talk) 18:49, 3 July 2017 (CET)
  2. Individual enough to be on its on page. We have the same ammount of info about it as we have about the Flame ClawsSurelNuva (Talk) 12:04, 8 July 2017 (CET)
  3. --WOLKsite (talk) 16:39, 10 July 2017 (CET)


The Piraka weapons are individuals enough to deserve their own pages. — SurelNuva (Talk) 14:16, 30 June 2017 (CET)

The Shark Tooth Blades and Tri-talons have enough info on them to merit pages of their own, but I think that one for the Twin Knives is unneeded. I also like the suggestion of having both the normal and Kal shields on the same page, but for now let's keep the voting options apart. Lastly, I don't think that a page for the Va's tools is needed, simply because they don't already have pages of their own but are mentioned in the abilities and traits sections of their respective Bohrok, so they are fine like this. ~OnionShark 15:44, 30 June 2017 (CET)
Pahrak Va have the same hammers as Turaga Onewa, the Tahnok Va have firestaffs like Turaga Vakama. — SurelNuva (Talk) 15:49, 30 June 2017 (CET)
One more reason to get rid of the 7 Rahkshi staffs that answer claims that the shape of the staff doesn't matter, they are just the focus.[OGD: May 19 2003, 11:29 AM] So Guurahk's and the Rahkshi of Heat Vision's staff are the same weapon, but being held by another Rahkshi. — SurelNuva (Talk) 17:44, 30 June 2017 (CET)
It seems like batching clone weapons on a single page would be better organization, but will character pages have any info for tools or will all the info be on the list of clone weapons? Also, in the case of say, Takadox's Twin Knives, where his weapon would be merged with his character page, does anybody think it excessive to have a page batching the Barraki tools together even though they are not clone tools?--Harsulin's Ghost (talk) 02:01, 1 July 2017 (CET)

Eh I think we should only be doing this sort of thing for clone weapons. -- Morris the Mata Nui Cow (talk) 05:28, 1 July 2017 (CET)

Do we have any other clone tools? — SurelNuva (Talk) 12:10, 8 July 2017 (CET)
Bohrok Va still need to be voted on. I'll make the section.--Harsulin's Ghost (talk) 18:19, 12 July 2017 (CET)
Oops. Didn't realize it was already decided. And no, I suppose they don't have staffs, I guess I was just thinking about Tahnok Va when I did that.--Harsulin's Ghost (talk) 20:44, 12 July 2017 (CET)